Clean_up wrote:Kind of curious if you are just considering the home of the team or where the actual players are from? Example, Corona Angels Knighten has 4 Riverside County Players, 2 from LA County and 8 from the OC. PowerSurge has a couple from the OC as well and Temecula area which is technically Riverside County I think. So, is the topic which county has the greatest talent pool or where are the best teams/organizations based out of? Seems to me San Diego County has always had a couple very strong teams, LA and Riverside County as well; but I'm going to have to vote for the OC for having more talented softball players than any of the other counties, speaking in numbers. JMO
This is a curious question. How would one answer it? I suppose the first thing to do would be to define what is meant by 'best.' What is the age group? Do the teams have the 'best' winning records? Do they place more players in college?
Here's the population of some of the counties being discussed.
Los Angeles 10,363,850
San Diego 3,146,274
Orange 3,121,251
Riverside 2,088,322
San Bernardino 2,055,766
Ventura 831,537
Teams are generally based somewhere and it often has to do with field availability along with distance to the head coach's residence. I believe that's how a team derives its definition as OC or LACO or SD etc...?
Can we classify a team as being an OC team if most of its players do not come from OC? I suppose one could look at the professional sports analog. Those teams are classified by town but players come from nearly everywhere.
Given the numbers above we could talk about players on good teams by home of record per capita? If that's the case it may be that 'watcher' has made a valid conclusion. Ventura County is lightly populated by comparison and there are quite a few good players coming from there even if they don't play on Ventura County teams
