Ks softball fan wrote:Funny - I was just venting about hating the process with a friend before reading this thread. I have a 2014 that is "above average". Gold Player, good organization, solid outfielder, high avg -low power slapper.
I have been blown away watching kids commit the last 3 years, many of which are not as good as they seem to be valued. Most are being signed due to who they play for. As example, we were on an independent team last year, played in Montgomery at 16U nats, and played in several high level showcases. Local college (D1) coach would tell our coach they liked our players, but were concerned we did not play big tournaments... We would watch them watch other games at the same tournaments we were at... Our stud pitcher left (as did we) after the season, joined a "top club", got an offer from said college...without playing any tournaments for them. CONFUSED.
I propose that the college coaches prefer the system to send them kids through the clubs as opposed to beating the bushes and actually scouring for talent. We have a Juco in our area that every year places kids at big D1 - kids that did not play on the top clubs. JUCO did not improve them that much...right?
My DD is getting the attention she deserves, D2 and some small D1 schools. She went from "gotta go away" 2 years ago to "i want to be close to home" now. Glad she decided that early and on her own! Expensive to learn Labor Day weekend of Freshman year...
Anyway - I agree with original post and most after - although I question why the parents are to blame? The colleges and clubs have nothing to lose with early commits - I told my DD at one point she should just send a note to ASU (her dream) committing and copy the local newspaper. It means as much as most of these committs... But now the top clubs are co-inviting one another to their invites, dont have to play way in to nationals, get their kids into top camps (Allisters), get the phone calls about other area kids... And I am not kidding about the last piece - I know for fact that a D1 called the area 800lb gorilla to ask about the stud pitcher above - told them he thought she was good, but would not vouch because he had not coached her, then proceeded to use that leverage to bring the kid over. LAZY college coaching in my opinion - and reinforces the top club influence. Hard to blame parents for not falling into traps laid by colleges and clubs. And now rankings are based on college commits - who is motivated to do what? Parents are the problem...dont think so.
Lots to argue with above i am sure - but had to join the venting.
Current system, lets call it, Confused College Coaches + Somewhat Organized Orgs is not that great. It is still better than the system it replaced, which was, Confused College Coaches + New group of coaches hard selling their wares every year. Assume the Confused College Coaches is not going away, what can you add to the other side of the equation to fix it.
Again I find myself looking at football. I know a few guys in the local area that fly all over the us on behalf of their alma mater, a pretty powerful football school. There is like a group of 15 guys, they use their own money to fly around and scout prospects. They are gone to a new town every Friday night of Fall. Blanketing the US looking for just the right players. All in a precursor to the huge recruiting effort the football team will put into the more worthwhile candidates. If a softball teams spends 200k on recruiting, football spends 2.4M a year. And still a recruiting class of 20 will wash out 10, most of them just not a good fit.