PDad wrote:Spazsdad wrote:Cycling is the dirtiest sport on the planet. I don't really care if he did or not, the whole tour is corrupt. The guy lost a nut and won 7 times on what was essentially, for cycling, a level playing field. The Euros have always hated any American that was successful in the Tour. Not like you can hand the award down to the next in line, he is just as dirty.
Bottom line the guy, and his story, raised millions of dollars for charity. Nothing was gained by this and much was lost.
Tygart \was on a mission to make a name for himself and his useless USADA.
Nothing gained by this?
How about vindication for all the people Armstrong went after for daring to suggest he was cheating? He ruined Greg LeMond's business after the 3-time Tour winner got suspicious because Armstrong was seeing Dr. Ferrari, a known figure in the doping world. Armstrong also won at least one defamation lawsuit against a newspaper as part of his cover-up.
How about reparations for all the people he damaged (e.g. LeMond, sponsors, etc.)? They deserve far more than a public apology and he has the money ($100 million?) to do it.
The consequences of the cheating (i.e. being stripped of the titles) are minor compared to what in store for him due to the lengthy fraud and cover-up.
Pdad, well said. This is exactly what I was referring to in my earlier comment. Not everyone he went after was a lying, doping scumbag.
The London Sunday Times is suing him to recover what they paid him in the defamation suit, his previous sponsors are lining up to sue him for damaging their brands, the IOC is investigating donations he made to the governing cycling board and could remove cycling from the Olympics if the trail leads to those officials, and he could be prosecuted for perjury and obstruction of justice.



























