Follow
Donate to HeyBucket.com - Amount:

Welcome Anonymous !

Your Fastpitch Softball Bible
 

TX

This weekend in DFW

by bigj6822 » Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:22 pm

Let's Play Two wrote:Justa,

I think you might be right about FC not having to prove anything. I think they are playing 14U prepping for the Ronald McDonald. It is going to be hard for the hitters on teams that are playing 16U ball at '43 to adjust to '40 at the RM. I sure wish our coach would have done that. Sure hope see them at the RM.

I think all of these first year pure '98 teams are going to struggle at the RM. Although I hear some of these top '98's are carrying some '97's. Especially pitchers, that should help them some.

Which top 98 teams are you talking about?
bigj6822
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 7:08 pm

by justawatcher » Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:16 pm

Let's Play Two wrote:Justa,

I think you might be right about FC not having to prove anything. I think they are playing 14U prepping for the Ronald McDonald. It is going to be hard for the hitters on teams that are playing 16U ball at '43 to adjust to '40 at the RM. I sure wish our coach would have done that. Sure hope see them at the RM.

I think all of these first year pure '98 teams are going to struggle at the RM. Although I hear some of these top '98's are carrying some '97's. Especially pitchers, that should help them some.


I agree with all of that. Ronald McDonald will be the first (and only) test this fall for the younger teams. One thing I've noticed though is that all of these teams that think they are playing up are basically playing 14U at 43ft. I don't understand the thinking there but to each his own. Even the 16/18U tourneys that aren't full of younger teams it seems like the TDs are lining up the younger teams with the other younger teams or very weak older teams. Why put a first year pitcher at 43ft. just to play other first year teams?
justawatcher
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:54 am
Location: Galveston, TX

by Let's Play Two » Wed Oct 05, 2011 8:59 pm

Bigj,

We have played Glory(Allen) once this year a few tournaments ago and I know one pitched against us. I believe they have two '97 pitchers. Correct me if I'm wrong, don't want to start rumors. Pride has a '97 or two? Not sure if they are pitchers this info was on HB in some earlier post. Firecrackers have any? They sure have some big girls. Haven't kept up with all top 98's seems like you might know some. Please advise.

Justa,

Yeah just like you mention most of the top '97 teams and top older teams are playing showcases or older tournaments. It would be nice to have everybody play in their age group at least most of the time.
Let's Play Two
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:10 am

by justawatcher » Thu Oct 06, 2011 8:45 am

Let's Play Two wrote:Bigj,

We have played Glory(Allen) once this year a few tournaments ago and I know one pitched against us. I believe they have two '97 pitchers. Correct me if I'm wrong, don't want to start rumors. Pride has a '97 or two? Not sure if they are pitchers this info was on HB in some earlier post. Firecrackers have any? They sure have some big girls. Haven't kept up with all top 98's seems like you might know some. Please advise.

Justa,

Yeah just like you mention most of the top '97 teams and top older teams are playing showcases or older tournaments. It would be nice to have everybody play in their age group at least most of the time.


Glory Adkins Allen and Pride have 97s, yes. I am not sure on FC. Many of the other teams do as well. This is that age group though where the birth year becomes irrelevant. So if FC does have 97s who are 8th graders pitching, do you believe that they have an advantage over teams with 98 pitchers who are 8th graders? I'm not picking on FC, I really have no idea what their makeup is. On the other hand, a team full of 97 freshman would probably have an advantage playing a team full of 98 7th graders. Maybe.
justawatcher
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:54 am
Location: Galveston, TX

by dallasFP » Thu Oct 06, 2011 9:23 am

justawatcher wrote:
I agree with all of that. Ronald McDonald will be the first (and only) test this fall for the younger teams.


Not really. Looks like only 5 teams from DFW are even playing Ronald McDonald.

Batbusters Spuria
Firecrackers
Elite (Strawn)
Glory (Kyser)
Adkins (Allen)

Far as I know, none of these are "younger" teams despite some of them being called 98... at one time or another.
dallasFP
 
Posts: 186
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:04 pm

by 3urout » Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:39 pm

:ugeek: :twisted: :lol:
Last edited by 3urout on Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
3urout
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 12:24 pm

by justawatcher » Fri Oct 07, 2011 5:20 am

3urout wrote:I can not speak for the others...however, FC is an all '98 team.


How many 2017s?
justawatcher
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:54 am
Location: Galveston, TX

by pitcherzpop » Sun Oct 09, 2011 6:03 pm

so i guess everyone was rained out. how did the teams do before the rains came?
pitcherzpop
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 5:59 pm

by TX MAVERICK » Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:47 pm

pitcherzpop wrote:so i guess everyone was rained out. how did the teams do before the rains came?


Grand Prairie 14U (Toughest 14U this week in my opinion)
Bombers 3-0
Rhine 3-0
Glory Blue 99 3-0
Fireballs 3-0
Firecrackers 2-1 (Beat by Glory Blue 99)
American Freedom 3-0

Allen 14U (Pool Schedule not finished)

Pool A
Thunderstix 2-0
Glory Red 99 2-0

Pool B
Sliders 2-0
Dallas Tigers 2-0

Pool C
Firestix 2-0

Pool D
D-Bat Lopez 2-0
Glory Adkins Tolan 2-0
TX MAVERICK
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:48 am

by dallasFP » Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:09 am

Top 3 no order...
Sherman 12U: NT Eagles, Glory, Stealth
Southlake 12U: Batbusters Bryson, Dallas Tigers, Elite
Garland 14U: Pool A - Glory Blue, TFS, D-bat Lopez Pool B - Blaze, Freedom Kennedy, Glory
Last edited by dallasFP on Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
dallasFP
 
Posts: 186
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 6:04 pm

PreviousNext

Return to TX

cron