hit4power wrote:Well, at least around here, if you had a tournament consisting of the ASA qualified teams vs. the PGF qualified teams the ASA qualified teams would win hands down
???
Tell us how you came up with that Einstein...
hit4power wrote:Well, at least around here, if you had a tournament consisting of the ASA qualified teams vs. the PGF qualified teams the ASA qualified teams would win hands down
Joe wrote:hit4power wrote:Well, at least around here, if you had a tournament consisting of the ASA qualified teams vs. the PGF qualified teams the ASA qualified teams would win hands down
???
Tell us how you came up with that Einstein...
TexasYellowBall wrote:ASA is still number 1...
I agreeTexasYellowBall wrote:Glory Shelton and helpers ran a solid tournament. The umpires were umpires with their usual ups and downs. The bracket set up was a little crazy,but thats the way it goes sometimes. No water in the dugout showed signs of money hoarding and that was a little sad. I disagree, money hoarding would be if they didn't allow coolers and forced you to pay $2.25 for a bottle of water, and if they charged an entry fee. Neither of which happened.
With PGF awarding spots, it will never really be a real true national championship. The awarded teams did not have to battle 105 heat, exhausted pitchers and players. They only had to open an email to get the invite. Until everyone has to play to get in, the PGF is just a pure money making tournament. Note: it is usually very hot in Texas in July. The teams that were awarded berths from New Jersey or Florida or California, did not have to necessarily play in 105 degree heat either. For that matter, neither did the teams that qualified in Houston n early June. That does not make them any less worthy. As for the true national champion, I think awarded spots has less to do with a true national champion then location and timing do. I suspect you will see more Texas teams attempting to qualify for ASA (Oklahoma) then you do PGF (if it stays in California.) But we will find that out next year when the awarded spots are no longer.
ASA is still number 1 and it does not matter what organization claims to be better. Go ask, AFA, IFA, NSA, USSSA, USFA, triple crown, and the list goes on and on.....ASA still remains the leader. Mute point, all of those other organizations did not have the support of top programs from around the country. Those organizations are regional at best. PGF has a leg up on those organizations from a relevance point of view.
Congrats to the winners, they were the best teams at the tournament and deserved the berths.
Tell us how you came up with that Einstein...
I would totally agree that a tournament of QUALIFIED ASA teams and QUALIFIED PGF teams, the ASA teams would be stronger. But if you are including the awarded teams, then PGF would get the nod.

DoingWork wrote:A couple of questions and comments on the ASA/PGF debate:
1. Have you or your daughter ever played/coached at a Premier nationals? No. How many have they had?
2. Have you or your daughter ever played/coached at an ASA Gold nationals?No. DD is not old enough yet.
3. Have you or your daughter ever played/coached for one of the major Cali teams?No. We live in Texas and have no desire to move to Cali.
If you only answered yes to question #2 you have no idea what you are taking about and all of your arguments for/against either ASA or PGF should be void.
Spazsdad wrote:Wouldn't the teams playing in a tournament determine the "best nationals" instead of the location of the tournament?
Spazsdad wrote:Does holding nationals in the middle of nowhere make it a better tournament to attend?