Sam wrote:Tumblebug wrote:The LL data is somewhat interesting, but not really comparable since LL pitchers throw from 46' and don't leap towards home plate when they pitch. Softball pitchers are 35' from the batter at release....LL pitchers are 41' or 42' from the batter....LL pitchers have more time to react....about 15% more time. Those are facts aren't they?
Whether LL injury statistics are relevant I don't know, but I know that the mere fact that there is 15% more distance is far from dispositive on the issue. How fast do baseballs hit by boys travel relative to softballs hit by girls? And how much damage do the two different balls do in same-speed impacts? Perhaps it is an apples to oranges comparison...but which are the apples and which are the oranges?
Anecdotal stories about injuries have zero probative value with respect to whether these bats present an unacceptable risk of danger to the girls. The
only way to properly assess risk is to determine how many catastrophic injuries have occurred relative to the frequency of opportunities for such injuries to occur. And it seems to me that the evidence is coming down heavily against the proposition that the bats are excessively dangerous. ASA might not keep data about every injury that occurs, but you can bet that they track all of the really serious ones, and those are what this discussion is exclusively concerned with.
Now if you want to bring non-catastrophic injuries into the equation, you'll have to start evaluating all of the myriad other ways that kids can get hurt playing softball, and advocating for mitigating those risks as well. There are collisions, and twisted ankles, and slippery bases, and balls flying all over the place in practice and in warm-ups, etc., etc. I would wager that the vast majority of injuries in softball are of this nature, and not from batted balls.
And Sam, several times in this thread you have admonished that
eventually somebody is going to get killed. The fact that you haven't been talking about kids who have
already been killed is telling...because the bats you complain of are used to hit untold thousands of softballs at girls in games every single weekend. If the risk was more than infinitesimal, you would already have plenty of headstones to point to.
The fact that Tumblebug manufactures these bats doesn't make him a bad person. Nor does it render his statistics or arguments any less valid. If his arguments are bad, demonstrate it. If his statistics are faulty, show how. Attacking his character neither advances your argument nor weakens his.
FWIW, and IMO.