GSB wrote:Skarp wrote:So far I'm not seeing the same pop out of the CF4 as I saw out of the RT, TZ, and Phenix. Most of the girls on dd's team are swinging the CF4, and none of them are having great results with it, IMO. I don't know if it's just a matter of waiting for it to open up, or what.
I have to agree with you Skarp. I have been watching that bat for a while now. Not even close to the pop of the old CF3. I am also disappointed with the new Stealth Clarity line. They go from making one of the best bats in the sport (ie..the purple and white) to the overpriced turds of the bat market (ie..Clarity). It kinda makes me wonder, why are the bats going backwards in performance? Do you think they are trying to comply with possible ASA bat changes ahead of schedule? I am thinking these bat companies may have gotten hold of some information we don't know yet.
I have been trying to find an article I read about the new bat specs but I can't find it. I do think that the CF3 and CF4 have the same standards but I could be wrong. The original DeMarini Phenix is rated at 98 mph right off the shelf. Once that bat is broken in it will exceed 100 mph.
Their was a reason this year in the College World Series why you didn't see very many of the new Easton Clarity Bats. That bat is 92 mph off the shelf, (like all the new composite bats) but the more you hit it the hotter is gets. For some brilliant reason Easton designed that bat so when the bat reached 98 mph their would be a black streak that appears on the barrel letting every under the sun know that the bat it now to good to use for ASA standards.
The new DeMarini bats come off he shelf at 92 mph also but in do time that bat will exceed the 98 mph. Unlike the Easton bats unless the bat is tested no one will know you are swinging a 100+ mph bat.