RT4ever wrote:There are a lot of good people at Softballfans.com. This guy does not represent them.
That has been my experience so far . . .
RT4ever wrote:There are a lot of good people at Softballfans.com. This guy does not represent them.
just curious wrote:This Anderson lovefest is making my stomach turn. Did you guys all get a set of knee pads when you bought you RT/TK/NANOTEK wonder stick?
It was only a few short years ago when Anderson didn't give a crap about FP. Now girls FP is the greatest thing since sliced bread to them even though the FP models are the last to arrive in the marketplace.![]()
Oh wait, I guess they saw the light $$$$$$$$.
Bottom line you never see their product being used at the top levels of FP
Flame on minions of Anderson
just curious wrote:Missinit wrote:Well MORON, are you so stupid that you think the competitors aren't giving and/or paying these top level teams to swing their bat for publicity of their product to raise the bottom line![]()
Sit down and shut up
Like I said to end my post:
"Flame on minions of Anderson" and you guys have more than proved my point.
Try reading your own posts to see how silly you sound in your slobbering homage to all that is Anderson. Decent bat? Sure. Guiding light of the fastpitch world? Not so much.
Is tumblebug really Jim Jones?
You guys are too funny
just curious wrote:Missinit wrote:Well MORON, are you so stupid that you think the competitors aren't giving and/or paying these top level teams to swing their bat for publicity of their product to raise the bottom line![]()
Sit down and shut up
Like I said to end my post:
"Flame on minions of Anderson" and you guys have more than proved my point.
Try reading your own posts to see how silly you sound in your slobbering homage to all that is Anderson. Decent bat? Sure. Guiding light of the fastpitch world? Not so much.
Is tumblebug really Jim Jones?
You guys are too funny
Tumblebug wrote:I'm sorry I didn't bring any troll food. Can I get you a glass of Kool-aid?

PDad wrote:Tumblebug wrote:I'm sorry I didn't bring any troll food. Can I get you a glass of Kool-aid?
Nice line! Unfortunately, responses are troll food.
I've got some questions for you - how do you maintain a weight drop across the different lengths of a bat model? Do you start with one initial length and adjust from there? What kind of adjustments do you make for the different lengths?
Tumblebug wrote:PDad wrote:I've got some questions for you - how do you maintain a weight drop across the different lengths of a bat model? Do you start with one initial length and adjust from there? What kind of adjustments do you make for the different lengths?
The weight drop is not linear in the sense that it is much more difficult to make weight on the shorter bats and the longer bats tend to get light. But generally we start with a specific shape design and build the most popular weight as "perfect" then take length from a combination of the barrel and handle. In a perfect world you can take a half inch from both ends and the weight holds true but that is not always the case. We are experimenting with a new process that would allow us to design and build each length/weight combo individually "perfect" but it is more difficult in terms of process set-up and inventory control. To be very good at it, our manufacturing lot size will have to get much smaller

PDad wrote:Tumblebug wrote:PDad wrote:I've got some questions for you - how do you maintain a weight drop across the different lengths of a bat model? Do you start with one initial length and adjust from there? What kind of adjustments do you make for the different lengths?
The weight drop is not linear in the sense that it is much more difficult to make weight on the shorter bats and the longer bats tend to get light. But generally we start with a specific shape design and build the most popular weight as "perfect" then take length from a combination of the barrel and handle. In a perfect world you can take a half inch from both ends and the weight holds true but that is not always the case. We are experimenting with a new process that would allow us to design and build each length/weight combo individually "perfect" but it is more difficult in terms of process set-up and inventory control. To be very good at it, our manufacturing lot size will have to get much smaller
Thanks for the insights.
BTW, smaller lot sizes have been the trend for over 20 years now, starting with the advent of the just-in-time concepts in the 80s. If done right, it will pay for itself with decreased inventory costs, waste and production lead times.