wadeintothem wrote:Blind Squirrel wrote:I am such an idiot. I've been watching the kids this whole time instead of the umpires. At least my kid's coaches got it right when they selected which tournaments to attend based upon the quality of the umpires.
The participants in the NIT and NCAA basketball tournaments are selected from the same pool of teams. The moral of the story is obvious.
John
no, I dont think it is obvious.
What the heck is the moral?
Tournaments actually are selected for top honors based on the quality of the event. A large part of a quality event is in fact umpires. An example is Colorado fireworks, where they spend a great deal of money bringing in and housing and taking care of umpires, and they want good ones. By this investment, they are not simply using left over Colorado local yocals. Another example is Fresno Force, which also brings in outside umpires to ensure they are offering a quality field of play. You parents may not be aware of it, your big concern is how far you have to walk to the restroom, how much wind there is when you are trying to set up your awning, and where to buy a hot dog. Those managing these tournaments and especially those who are concerned with a quality event are certainly aware of it. But if you name a top event, you will find quality ASA trained umpires... right down to the NCAA WCWS.
I dont know Gary's plan, 3 man crews, flying them in, or perhaps he has the attitude about umpires that "they all suck" as you guys do.. but from my vantage, umpiring, and the quality there of, is in fact a big deal as a part of the overall show and package you get when you attend an event.
My first paragraph was in response to the other guys third paragraph where he seemed to suggest that umpires are the center of the softball universe. I'm just a dumbass parent whose focus is on the kids. To me, everyone else plays a supporting role. I notice them only when they do something I think is noteworthy, which, in the case of umpires means I almost never notice them at all. That would explain why, in more than 10 years of my 2 kids playing a variety of sports, I have never yelled a derogatory remark at an official. Further, I doubt that people think umps in general suck. Those that do feel that way are ignorant in that they have likely never tried to call a game. Or their self-serving perception is that their little precious is victimized by umpires every time she strikes out or her team loses, which happens far too often for them to bear.
I separated subsequent comments into a separate paragraph because it was a response to a separate issue. That issue was the following comment: "Until Premier can make such a claim, Premier cannot rightfully claim to be the organization with the best competition." First, I don't know that Gary is trying to establish a competing organization but rather to put on a tournament. Second, "the best competition" to me means just that. What is the relative strength of the teams in a particular tournament? The moral is it doesn't matter what the tournament is called, it matters who is competing. The NIT had the best teams at one time, now it is the NCAA tournament. The "National Championship" is awarded accordingly. If my kid's team won in OKC next year, I sure as Hell wouldn't go popping off around SoCal about her team being the National Champs when I know the quality and quantity of the teams that weren't there. In fact, if I gave a shit about such things, I would rather have an OCBB Friendly Champs T-Shirt from Gary's new tournament than I would a National Champ medal from next year's OKC tournament. Because of my perceptions of the other teams in the tournament.
I get your pride and defensiveness. I would likely feel the same way if I cared as much about and put as much time and effort into, the thankless job of umpiring that you and your ilk do. But not every parent/coach/HB post seeks to indict all officials as the scourge of mankind.
Regards,
John
10 years from now I'll wish I felt like I do these days.