L84DNR wrote: What do you think about a player leaving a team mid season (second season) with no warning out of the blue to pursue a better opportunity.
Feeling no obligation to them, should I.....?
First of all, No - In this case it seems you are correct in feeling no obligation to them. My opinion is that a coach is obliged to provide development, opportunity, and exposure for his players, as well as to treat them with respect, dignity, and honesty. It seems here the parents went out on their own to look for a better opportunity and better exposure. This is usually where the debate begins. It always seems that the grass is always greener on the other side. I've witnessed first hand, parents and their DDs leaving a great situation because they "thought" there was a better opportunity somewhere else. I even know some girls who have missed out on National Championships because they thought there was better opportunity somewhere else.
I'm sure you as a coach felt a commitment to that player in your duties, as do hundreds of other coaches. I just wish some of these parents felt the same commitment towards the teams they start the season with. Because this really creates a hardship on the coach, the team, and the remaining girls. Especially if you have told other interested players in your team, "no, sorry - we'd love to have you but we have that position covered already". Now all of sudden, you're looking to fill that spot.
Sams rule of thumb is exactly right and is usually universal. But I do believe coaches in general, should never hold any girl back if the opportunity is obvious. For example, an exception of a mid-season move may be the move from a B team to an A team. But it doesn't sound like this is your situation since BS was given as the reason for leaving.
Question for thought: Does ASA need to start freezing players to rosters once a top 3 or top 5 finish is achieved. Then only allow a team 3 roster moves after freezing?? Would this help cut down on mid-season moves? Doesn't USSSA do this? Just questions!