It is obvious that this young lady is very talented and by all accounts on this site works hard. I am sure that this was great news to this young lady and her family.
As far as a great accomplishment-not sure. Here is what she got:
UCLA bascically said that we have some ($$$$) for you(which can change) maybe if the following does not happen:
-coach changes
-injury
-lousy grades
-bad sat/act
-we change our mind
-skills dont change
Now this obviously puts her in better position than 99% of her peers
The broader question is it good for the sport? IMO, no. Despite Sam's obvious hyperbole, he actually brings up some good points that should cause everyone on this site to lokk at themselves in the mirror. To dismiss those(with experience) as "haters" or "jealous" is foolhardy. we should all think back about what are deision process was like at 13 and how much can and does happen from 13-18. I think can all understand why the parents would want this and why the coaches do this. Unfortunately it sets up an "arms race" where coaches commit younger and younger(as well as more and more" and parents/athletes fee more and more pressured to commit or be left behind. How many times do you read a "Who's Going Where" post and see "school of their dreams" and you see the school and go WTF, really? IMO the choice of school should be made on academic reasons and what opportunities it will help in a career/emplyment after school. If it does not, frankly it is a waste of time. Obviously many players commit early, go to the school of their "dreams" and it works out great, but how many cast to the side somewhere along the process? We never hear about those.
It is right to celebrate the current fortunes of this young player, but we should also be aware of the pitfalls and consequences that may result