MTR wrote:bigsig wrote:dittoz wrote:If I recall correctly, that's a protestable call
If the situation warrants it, do it!
Umpire's judgement, NOT protestable.
It is protestable if the umpire interprets the rule incorrectly. The umpire stated the pitcher must keep contact with the pitcher's plate until the ball is pitched. That is not true, hence it is a rule interpretation which is indeed protestable.
bigsig wrote:
Here is what I'm looking at:
ASA 2008
Rule 6 Sec 3 Legal Delivery
I: In the act of delivering the ball the pitcher must take one step with the non-pivot foot simultaneous with the release of the ball.....It is not a step if the pitcher slides the foot across the the pitcher's plate or if the pivot foot turns or slides in order to push off the plate, provided contact is maintained with the plate.
(Underlines are mine)
IMO Sounds like the ump's explanation was correct.
bigsig wrote:
Here is what I'm looking at:
ASA 2008
Rule 6 Sec 3 Legal Delivery
I: In the act of delivering the ball the pitcher must take one step with the non-pivot foot simultaneous with the release of the ball.....It is not a step if the pitcher slides the foot across the the pitcher's plate or if the pivot foot turns or slides in order to push off the plate, provided contact is maintained with the plate.
(Underlines are mine)
IMO Sounds like the ump's explanation was correct.
BeyondTheScoreBoard wrote:It sounds like the umpire was applying a slo-pitch rule.
pdj wrote:This is an attempt to engage a memory that is on the decline.
In about 1983 ASA started to allow the leap by rule. There was a lot of harping, and leaping, for several years prior. Roy Burlison is a name that comes to mind for one that changed the game of pitching with an explosion off of the rubber.
With so many people going to a leaping windmill from slingshot the pivot foot watchers had a tough few years. A number of older players/fans still bemoan the one foot on and leap as killing the male game.