NumeroUno wrote:Of coarse they recruit outfielders no one said they didn't.
NumeroUno wrote:It's about college outfields that don't look good on the grass because they played infield their entire life.
With all due respect, Uno, you're contradicting yourself. You and others KEEP implying that these OFs are all converted IFs. I agree that some are, but most of them are recruited as OFs. And I don't agree with you jumping to the conclusion that "
they don't look good on the grass because they played infield their entire life." Some of those converted IFs ARE good on the grass, as this post started with a great catch by a converted IF. Some college OFs are better than others. Maybe it has to do with whether they were converted, but until you research the TB background of OFs making errors, taking bad cuts, etc, it's not fair to jump to the "converted OF" conclusion.
Clearly, I'm in the minority here, so believe what you will.