RaeRae56 wrote:As a follow up to my last post...I am familiar with 1994 teams...So to review the most recent 12u teams, here goes...
the top teams for the last 3 years have been Victory USA, Corona Angels and Lakewood Ladies '94...
Their accomplishments are as follows...
Victory USA
-2005...finish 9th at 12u nationals as young 12u team
-2006...finish 1st at 12u nationals
-2007...finish 2nd at 14u nationals as a young team
Corona Angels
-2006...finish 3rd at 12u nationals
-2007...finish 3rd at 14u nationals as a young team
Lakewood Ladies
2006...finish 2nd at 12u nationals
2007...finish 1st at 14u nationals as a young team
Notice I dont mention Fresno, USSSA, AFA, Chino, T4T...etc... the proof is in the pudding at NATIONALS... its all fun and stuff to speculate, but the rankings don't mean a thing until youve competed and succeeded at the highest level...which is ASA Nationals
IMHO...Those were/and still are "A' teams...If you want to be an "A" team... then accomplish something legitimate first... otherwise... you're a "B" team at best...
Having just exited that age group, I used to see teams "ranked high" but then choke at Nationals... so were they still "A" teams? of course not...it's cause they never were an "A" team to begin with except in the feel good world of rankings
Again... IMHO =o)
RaeRae56 - having watched the 1994 teams since 10u and having watched the 1996 12u Teams at Chino Hills... I agree and have removed the Grade A ranking. You are correct in non of the current top teams have proven themself like the 1994 "Big 3".
And frankly I do not remember seeing the CA95 team lose two pool play games (going 1-2 in pool play) and winning a tournment. Parents of the CA95 please tell me I'm wrong!!! so there is hope for this years "top team"
The good news from Chino was the OC Batbuster - Show 97 team ( ... the 10U ASA National champion) does remind me of Campbell's 12u in 2005... but they may do better then 9th at Nationals this year!