Here’s a thought that may stir some debate: is there a real, significant value to having attended ASA Nationals beyond 14U as far as college recruiting?
At 16/18/Gold tournaments, camps and skills events you have exposure, the girls have sent coaches there schedules, the college recruiters are at the tournament… they see reality. Conversely, there are teams and coaches pushing ASA Nationals and how it will dress up your resume, possibly at some exclusion of other high-visibility events simply based on not having Bill Gates’ checkbook and having the time/finances to do it all.
The question is… beyond 14U, does playing ASA Nats really… really matter to college coaches or do you believe coaches are more interested in exposure tournaments, skills videos and on-site, first hand looks?
My personal opinion based on limited experience is that ASA Nats are over rated. Yes, I have (my daughter has…) attended Nats several times, all but one, top ten finishes. No sour grapes. However, when it comes down to a team deciding what their goal is for the year, the option to play age-bracket tournaments early and focus on exposure tournaments and camps later in the year could... be an option. Key to the decision is the perception, real or imagined, the ASA Nats actually counts for something substantial in the eyes of college recruiters.
Contrived, mythical question; If given only one choice between 16/18U Nats and Fireworks (or similar)... which would you choose?
Not trying to start a flame throwing exercise and launch bombs one way or the other. Just looking for rational, lucid opinions, observations and comments, experience based.
Regards,


























