This is from the green book, specifically bylaw 600.1 (special rule for San Diego Section):
b. Outside Team - During a San Diego Section athlete’s season of sport, he or she may not participate or practice on an outside team in the same sport (Approved January 21, 2003 Board of Managers). For the purpose of this rule, an outside team is defined as a non-CIF team consisting of half or more of the number of players required to start a contest by the respective National Federation rules book. Tackle football is considered to be a sport separate from touch or flag football. Examples of outside team sports that would be in conflict include (but not limited to) 3 on 3-basketball, slow pitch softball. Examples of outside team sports that would not be in conflict would be 2-person volleyball, 5 on 5-indoor soccer, and over-the-line softball.
As an only exception, athletes participating in the individual sports of swimming, diving, and gymnastics may practice during their season of sport, as unattached athletes, with club teams, which are established under the National Governing Board for that sport, so long as the athlete also practices with the school team, and the athlete is entered to compete as anunattached athlete in the CIF-approved competitions at Bylaw 600. (Approved June 3, 2003 Board of Managers)
NOTE: Tryouts for club teams during the high school season of sport are not permitted. Practices during the high school season of sport with less than one-half of the outside team are considered a violation of this bylaw.
I read a little further down and noticed the NOTE. This seems to be in direct conflict with the rule. I orignially asked, "Am I interpreting it correctly by saying a softball player could practice/workout with three other team members (less than half needed for a competition) from their outside team and still be in compliance with this rule?" According to the rule, this would be true, however the NOTE clearly states it is in violation. Which is it?
I'm dumbfounded as to how this can be published. Can someone explain this rule, without a contradicting NOTE added at the end?



























