The young ladies mentioned are all solid players. I've seen nearly all of them and they can play. Also, ladies don't get recruited by upper and middle tier D-1 programs unless they have been thoroughly scrutinized by the programs' coaching staffs. I'm not sure if this is part of the process, but it might be something that should be considered.
Although I am not a fan of a player's "body of work," I'm reasonably certain that it enters into play, especially in determining All-State selections and where a player lands. So, I am assuming that this is also part of the process.
Stats are always an issue, but they are the only real "measuring stick" that some coaches are able to use to assess a candidate, especially if they never have a chance to see a young lady play. I don't know or understand the "magic" behind the slection process, but stats have to be a part of it. I'm just not sure how you compare one candidate to another given the fact that they all play in different areas and against different qualities of teams. This certainly isn't the fault of the player, because many do not chose where they play or set the schedules.
Your points are well-made LP24, but I can assure you, speaking from personal experience, that not every coach is looking to pad a player's stats, but I know it happens. In my experience, I have had to make a case to get stats corrected. Depending on the team, number of games played (based oftentimes or weather conditions, etc.) one or two hits can significantly change a batting average. Perhaps a new thread should be started, but I wonder how different schools handle their "bookkeeping" duties and what efforts are made to make sure that the stats are correct. I also wonder how a player's parents feel about approaching the coaching staff to address errors in bookkeeping. What is the best approach, assuming there is one? DLauck, would you mind sharing your thoughts?


























