Follow
Donate to HeyBucket.com - Amount:

Welcome Anonymous !

Your Fastpitch Softball Bible
 

CA

Valencia strikes again!!!

by dodgerblue » Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:12 am

believe there is only one player on the current roster who is attending VHS on an inter-district transfer.


So everybody was crying for one transfer? They way everybody was talking I thought half the team was transferred in. Wow!
User avatar
dodgerblue
 
Posts: 495
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 8:06 am

by all softball » Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:18 am

It is common knowledge that this girl CANNOT PLAY AT ANY LEVEL ,as posted on the website for anyone to see. Is she really that big of a threat to you three grown men,that you would go through lengths to get rid of the competition?This continueing thread is about a principal at Canyon, and ex coaches,who had personnel and jealously issues over a sucessfull WOMEN COACH!When you couldnt go after her you went after a 15yr.old girl, your posts have said that,Good Job!Why is this girl NoT ALLOWED TO PLAY AT ANY LEVEL, when the girl from Golden Valley and a girl from Hart, did the same transfer? They are the same grade,transferred to same class, and under the SAME CIF rule 207, and they are allowed to play, and are playing at the Varsity level?Why was the Canyon High principal allowed to skip proper procedures and go straight to the head of CIF Mr. Staunton and put a block on this.I do know for a fact because I am friends with the family and read the paper, that she was denied because they FELT "it was for athletic reasons". No proof required because after all it is who you know!
This should be a big issue and concern for ALL parents.Could a principal or coach stop your children from playing because they dont like one another?If a child wants to pursue a class that they think they want as a career later in life so let them,before they go into the real world. In this matter it has become a personnel issue and has caused emotional harm to her.You didnt do any justice for anyone because now No kid will even give their school a chance going into 9th grade especially Canyon High.This principal has done nothing but tarnish and ruin the schools reputation, starting off years ago by getting rid of one of the most highly respected football coaches HW over not giving the players a bus, and the list goes on.By denieng this child from playing and not following the rules is only going to result in our children in ALL sports being used to get back at others!These rules are there to protect OUR kids but were totally disreguarded because someone felt like it. The CIF is for all the southern section schools and Mr. Staunton is in charge so if you think this wont effect you, because he doesnt have to be fair or follow rules, it might someday!I am a parent that is going to stand up to him and demand answers so my child will be treated fairly when they get to high school.If no questions are asked then no changes can be made. I will not let these adults decide our childrens high school experience.As for the ones making the rediculous post, you are ignorant and cowards for picking on a child,and your posts validate it! This ruling will effect everyone on some level if you look at the over all scheme of things , it is no longer just one families issue!
all softball
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:10 pm

by JustWondering » Tue Apr 13, 2010 12:40 pm

all softball wrote:It is common knowledge that this girl CANNOT PLAY AT ANY LEVEL ,as posted on the website for anyone to see. Is she really that big of a threat to you three grown men,that you would go through lengths to get rid of the competition?This continueing thread is about a principal at Canyon, and ex coaches,who had personnel and jealously issues over a sucessfull WOMEN COACH!When you couldnt go after her you went after a 15yr.old girl, your posts have said that,Good Job!Why is this girl NoT ALLOWED TO PLAY AT ANY LEVEL, when the girl from Golden Valley and a girl from Hart, did the same transfer? They are the same grade,transferred to same class, and under the SAME CIF rule 207, and they are allowed to play, and are playing at the Varsity level?Why was the Canyon High principal allowed to skip proper procedures and go straight to the head of CIF Mr. Staunton and put a block on this.I do know for a fact because I am friends with the family and read the paper, that she was denied because they FELT "it was for athletic reasons". No proof required because after all it is who you know!
This should be a big issue and concern for ALL parents.Could a principal or coach stop your children from playing because they dont like one another?If a child wants to pursue a class that they think they want as a career later in life so let them,before they go into the real world. In this matter it has become a personnel issue and has caused emotional harm to her.You didnt do any justice for anyone because now No kid will even give their school a chance going into 9th grade especially Canyon High.This principal has done nothing but tarnish and ruin the schools reputation, starting off years ago by getting rid of one of the most highly respected football coaches HW over not giving the players a bus, and the list goes on.By denieng this child from playing and not following the rules is only going to result in our children in ALL sports being used to get back at others!These rules are there to protect OUR kids but were totally disreguarded because someone felt like it. The CIF is for all the southern section schools and Mr. Staunton is in charge so if you think this wont effect you, because he doesnt have to be fair or follow rules, it might someday!I am a parent that is going to stand up to him and demand answers so my child will be treated fairly when they get to high school.If no questions are asked then no changes can be made. I will not let these adults decide our childrens high school experience.As for the ones making the rediculous post, you are ignorant and cowards for picking on a child,and your posts validate it! This ruling will effect everyone on some level if you look at the over all scheme of things , it is no longer just one families issue!


Wow
JustWondering
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:44 am
Location: Right Here

by Ace » Tue Apr 13, 2010 12:56 pm

all softball wrote:It is common knowledge that this girl CANNOT PLAY AT ANY LEVEL ,as posted on the website for anyone to see. Is she really that big of a threat to you three grown men,that you would go through lengths to get rid of the competition?This continueing thread is about a principal at Canyon, and ex coaches,who had personnel and jealously issues over a sucessfull WOMEN COACH!When you couldnt go after her you went after a 15yr.old girl, your posts have said that,Good Job!Why is this girl NoT ALLOWED TO PLAY AT ANY LEVEL, when the girl from Golden Valley and a girl from Hart, did the same transfer? They are the same grade,transferred to same class, and under the SAME CIF rule 207, and they are allowed to play, and are playing at the Varsity level?Why was the Canyon High principal allowed to skip proper procedures and go straight to the head of CIF Mr. Staunton and put a block on this.I do know for a fact because I am friends with the family and read the paper, that she was denied because they FELT "it was for athletic reasons". No proof required because after all it is who you know!
This should be a big issue and concern for ALL parents.Could a principal or coach stop your children from playing because they dont like one another?If a child wants to pursue a class that they think they want as a career later in life so let them,before they go into the real world. In this matter it has become a personnel issue and has caused emotional harm to her.You didnt do any justice for anyone because now No kid will even give their school a chance going into 9th grade especially Canyon High.This principal has done nothing but tarnish and ruin the schools reputation, starting off years ago by getting rid of one of the most highly respected football coaches HW over not giving the players a bus, and the list goes on.By denieng this child from playing and not following the rules is only going to result in our children in ALL sports being used to get back at others!These rules are there to protect OUR kids but were totally disreguarded because someone felt like it. The CIF is for all the southern section schools and Mr. Staunton is in charge so if you think this wont effect you, because he doesnt have to be fair or follow rules, it might someday!I am a parent that is going to stand up to him and demand answers so my child will be treated fairly when they get to high school.If no questions are asked then no changes can be made. I will not let these adults decide our childrens high school experience.As for the ones making the rediculous post, you are ignorant and cowards for picking on a child,and your posts validate it! This ruling will effect everyone on some level if you look at the over all scheme of things, it is no longer just one families issue!


If you plan on demanding answers via email, you might consider having your questions written FOR you, rather than BY you. :roll:
"A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed."
Ace
 
Posts: 574
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:58 pm

by Imperial SB Dad » Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:09 pm

JustWondering wrote:
all softball wrote:It is common knowledge that this girl CANNOT PLAY AT ANY LEVEL ,as posted on the website for anyone to see. Is she really that big of a threat to you three grown men,that you would go through lengths to get rid of the competition?This continueing thread is about a principal at Canyon, and ex coaches,who had personnel and jealously issues over a sucessfull WOMEN COACH!When you couldnt go after her you went after a 15yr.old girl, your posts have said that,Good Job!Why is this girl NoT ALLOWED TO PLAY AT ANY LEVEL, when the girl from Golden Valley and a girl from Hart, did the same transfer? They are the same grade,transferred to same class, and under the SAME CIF rule 207, and they are allowed to play, and are playing at the Varsity level?Why was the Canyon High principal allowed to skip proper procedures and go straight to the head of CIF Mr. Staunton and put a block on this.I do know for a fact because I am friends with the family and read the paper, that she was denied because they FELT "it was for athletic reasons". No proof required because after all it is who you know!
This should be a big issue and concern for ALL parents.Could a principal or coach stop your children from playing because they dont like one another?If a child wants to pursue a class that they think they want as a career later in life so let them,before they go into the real world. In this matter it has become a personnel issue and has caused emotional harm to her.You didnt do any justice for anyone because now No kid will even give their school a chance going into 9th grade especially Canyon High.This principal has done nothing but tarnish and ruin the schools reputation, starting off years ago by getting rid of one of the most highly respected football coaches HW over not giving the players a bus, and the list goes on.By denieng this child from playing and not following the rules is only going to result in our children in ALL sports being used to get back at others!These rules are there to protect OUR kids but were totally disreguarded because someone felt like it. The CIF is for all the southern section schools and Mr. Staunton is in charge so if you think this wont effect you, because he doesnt have to be fair or follow rules, it might someday!I am a parent that is going to stand up to him and demand answers so my child will be treated fairly when they get to high school.If no questions are asked then no changes can be made. I will not let these adults decide our childrens high school experience.As for the ones making the rediculous post, you are ignorant and cowards for picking on a child,and your posts validate it! This ruling will effect everyone on some level if you look at the over all scheme of things , it is no longer just one families issue!


Wow


Yep
Imperial SB Dad
 
Posts: 204
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:49 pm

by dodgerblue » Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:20 pm

I'm going to sum up this post with a simple statement.
Play where you're supposed to play! I have no dog in the fight and would never consider moving my kid to a school because they have a great softball program. If it's really about the classes then don't play sports and there's no issue.
User avatar
dodgerblue
 
Posts: 495
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 8:06 am

by Sftbll4ever » Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:26 pm

dodgerblue wrote:I'm going to sum up this post with a simple statement.
Play where you're supposed to play! I have no dog in the fight and would never consider moving my kid to a school because they have a great softball program. If it's really about the classes then don't play sports and there's no issue.


Well that just about sums it up for me!!! ;)
Sftbll4ever
 
Posts: 1842
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:27 am

by Blind Squirrel » Tue Apr 13, 2010 5:23 pm

My fragile little dumpling is currently a college freshman. We would like her to play for Valencia next year. Can someone tell me where I can get the transfer forms? Thanx in advance.

John
10 years from now I'll wish I felt like I do these days.
User avatar
Blind Squirrel
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 1138
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:02 am

by Ace » Tue Apr 13, 2010 6:05 pm

Blind Squirrel wrote:My fragile little dumpling is currently a college freshman. We would like her to play for Valencia next year. Can someone tell me where I can get the transfer forms? Thanx in advance.

John

HAHAHHA Im pretty sure this post bumps Skarps, "If done right, no can defend" from the funniest of the year! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
"A parent's only as good as their dumbest kid. If one wins a Nobel Prize but the other gets robbed by a hooker, you failed."
Ace
 
Posts: 574
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:58 pm

by coasterdude » Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:32 pm

Stay true to your school bottom line. It's to bad this bull_ _ _ _. Had to happen to such a great kid.






I'm just sayin.
coasterdude
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 5:40 pm

PreviousNext

Return to CA