Follow
Donate to HeyBucket.com - Amount:

Welcome Anonymous !

Your Fastpitch Softball Bible
 

Fastpitch Discussions

2012s SATs

What's on your mind?

by Joe » Tue Jul 26, 2011 5:03 pm

jonriv wrote:Problem with a fatter wallet- don't tell me your a communist?

plus define patriotic, honest and loyal??? There have been more Presidents from Harvard than from University of Texas??? You have a strange sense of logic Joe. Someone does not agree with you they are not patriotic???? Look- I do not agree with Harvard on their past ROTC stance-they certainly were not alone.-but it was decided by a VOTE- their decision

Saying someone is more patriotic because they go to texas instead of Harvard- lower SATs maybe?? Lower patriotism is just silly

My guess i given the choice- the US Army would take a Harvard grad over a Texas grad

BTW- the Harvard guy was number 1 in our ROTC advance course class


Okay now....hmmmmm...let me get this straight...

Anti-military, favors the Harvard wealthy over hard-working, honest, patriotic folks...and voted for gay marriage??? Very disappointing jonbovi....
Joe
 
Posts: 2393
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:25 pm

by fasterpitch92701 » Tue Jul 26, 2011 5:47 pm

Back to the original point noted... I am sure there was one somewhere... When DD was being scouted and courted the primary focal point of coaches was #1, SAT's. #2, GPA. #3. ACT's.

Most of the inquiries were from more eastern locals. I have no idea if that is typical. I can tell you of one instance where DD was playing in a west coast tourney with the obligatory sheets on the backstop. Coach of an east coast, Boston flavor university whom I shall not name but only state that that have a "YARD" named after them... as in ____ARD YARD... walked up scouting another girl on our team. She looked at the sheet, ran down the list, and said "who's that and where is she". It was DD. What caught her eye (she stated to our coach later) was the 4.37GPA and 2170 SAT's. ACT's were not a point of influence. Don't know why. Don't care. That was just reality for us.

Enjoy in good health.
User avatar
fasterpitch92701
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:41 pm

by jonriv » Tue Jul 26, 2011 5:53 pm

Joe wrote:
jonriv wrote:Problem with a fatter wallet- don't tell me your a communist?

plus define patriotic, honest and loyal??? There have been more Presidents from Harvard than from University of Texas??? You have a strange sense of logic Joe. Someone does not agree with you they are not patriotic???? Look- I do not agree with Harvard on their past ROTC stance-they certainly were not alone.-but it was decided by a VOTE- their decision

Saying someone is more patriotic because they go to texas instead of Harvard- lower SATs maybe?? Lower patriotism is just silly

My guess i given the choice- the US Army would take a Harvard grad over a Texas grad

BTW- the Harvard guy was number 1 in our ROTC advance course class


Okay now....hmmmmm...let me get this straight...

Anti-military, favors the Harvard wealthy over hard-working, honest, patriotic folks...and voted for gay marriage??? Very disappointing jonbovi....


Your last sentence makes no sense??? Because someone is wealthy they are not hard working- now you sound like Karl Marx

Are their liberals at Harvard-of course- I would bet because of it's sheer size their are numerically more liberal at the University of Texas- better watch out Joe!!!!
User avatar
jonriv
 
Posts: 4875
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 6:01 am
Location: Connecticut

by jonriv » Tue Jul 26, 2011 5:58 pm

say it ain't so Joe:
[quote]The largest chapter of College Democrats of America, University Democrats also serves the University of Texas student body by promoting voter registration among students and working with other student organizations to vitalize and motivate students to vote during efforts including the successful Hook the Vote campaign. Furthermore, the organization regularly couples with candidates to assist local Democrats with their respective campaigns. Members participate in blockwalks, phone banks, and other activities to help carry progressive candidates to victory./quote]

Because every thing's big in Texas- even the Liberals
User avatar
jonriv
 
Posts: 4875
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 6:01 am
Location: Connecticut

by CheckWriter » Tue Jul 26, 2011 7:57 pm

Ever find yourselves going the wrong way on an escalator?
I see no hope for the future of our people if they are dependent on the frivolous youth of today, for certainly all youth are reckless beyond words.
--- Hesiod, Eighth Century B.C.
User avatar
CheckWriter
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:23 pm

by Joe » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:13 pm

jonriv wrote:say it ain't so Joe:
The largest chapter of College Democrats of America, University Democrats also serves the University of Texas student body by promoting voter registration among students and working with other student organizations to vitalize and motivate students to vote during efforts including the successful Hook the Vote campaign. Furthermore, the organization regularly couples with candidates to assist local Democrats with their respective campaigns. Members participate in blockwalks, phone banks, and other activities to help carry progressive candidates to victory./quote]

Because every thing's big in Texas- even the Liberals


Yawn...

I'm much more interested about your value system that teaches a DD that large salaries and fat wallets are "better" than patriotism, honesty, and loyalty. How can you justify such values?
Joe
 
Posts: 2393
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:25 pm

by Big Momma » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:27 pm

Joe-Whenever your argument loses steam (which is as soon as you type it) you start another one. Why not just let go and move on. As long as the girls are being educated do you really feel the need to demean where or how that is happening? Until you financially contribute to the education of anyone your opinion is just that....yours. Keep it to yourself and stop insulting the choices made by others.

For your information I recieved a scholarship to play volleyball in college and my oldest DD has recieved a scholarship to play softball andi neither one of us took the SAT. She attended a very prestigious high school and a graduation requirement was the ACT plus Writing not the SAT. Those were taken if neccessary. If a school wants you to take the SAT you take it....if they want you to take the ACT you take it. This arguement is as assinine as Joe is!
Big Momma
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 9:59 am

by Joe » Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:42 pm

Big Momma wrote:Joe-Whenever your argument loses steam (which is as soon as you type it) you start another one.


Large Momma

Are we talking wide or tall? Amazon perhaps? Big boned or has time just caught up with you? Is gravity taking over?

Help me here so I can understand your issues completely...
Joe
 
Posts: 2393
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:25 pm

by NumeroUno » Tue Jul 26, 2011 9:30 pm

sftblldud wrote:I was talking to a friend this weekend at CC when a college coach walked up and we all started chatting amongst each other, when out of the blue the college coach says "It always concerns me when a 2012 does not have a SAT score".

This is to Coaches and Parents to get your kids to take the SAT or at the least Post your SAT score(Good or BAD). Then the Coaches at least have something to work with, if you don't have your SAT scores Coaches start thinking your trying to hide something.

Better to have it and not need it, then it is to need it and not have it. The TBA is not working well with the Coaches.


Here is the original post ladies :roll:
Help support heybucket and become a premium member today for only $12.00 a year
premium.html
User avatar
NumeroUno
 
Posts: 8928
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:50 pm

by noclu13 » Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:22 pm

Quotes from Joe -- "Have yer brainy sophomore study and take prep classes the summer before
their Jr. year".
"All my kids have done this and walked away with 2000+ plus sat's".
"but then, I've only sent 4 to college within the last 8 years and don't
have clue what I'm talking about".

Ok it might be kind of picky, but what you say in your quotes above is absolutely impossible. If you sent 4 kids to college in the last 8 years they could not possibly have all scored over 2000 on the SAT test. Based on your timeline, your first kid would have scored 2000+ 10 years ago. Up until 5 or 6 years ago the SAT test had a max score of 1600.
Responsibility is the Price of Freedom
noclu13
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:33 am

PreviousNext

Return to Fastpitch Discussions

cron