C77fastpitch wrote:Good idea Hinky, you and skarp stay off this forum. I've never heard either of you say one thing about softball. Do you guys have a regular job, or do you just stroll this forum waiting for the opportunity to show off your lack of intelligence. Neither of you have any idea how to debate. Your arguments consists of name calling, generalizations, regurgitating past post out of context, and using elementary catch phrases. I know your softball knowledge is limited, but it's also apparent your general intelligence is limited. Here's a challenge, without resorting to one of these debate fallacies state a clear opinion on something that is based on facts. Skarp, please be succinct, those long drawn out manifestos are too boring to read. Hinky, please stop talking for everyone else, and stop manufacturing disgust or outrage, that is the last refuge of a scoundrel.
Skarp's favorite fallacy is to regurgitate past post out of context. If you want to read something not out of context, read Skarp's post on men coaching women on fastpitch discussion. His beliefs on women in sports and in the work place, are both disturbingly misogynistic, and historically inaccurate. But then again fact base writing is not a tool of the uninformed or belligerent.
Hinkys' favorite fallacy is to recruit others in his manufactured disgust or outrage. Where upon he becomes their spokesperson, or at least he thinks he does. It's a well disguised, but repulsive ploy. However, easily recognizable to those who know what to look for.
Writing that you and your friends are less than intelligent is not name calling, It's simply the truth. Read more, that's the key to improvement. Especially fact based material, not comic books. I'm merely trying to make you both better.
Lame excuses for good arguments gentlemen, you both receive a failing grade- F. I'm truly sorry,
Ill be grading your posts from now on, so give it a better effort mates. CC and out!
Remember, this is just a post on a softball forum. So don't work up a nerve, and try to develop debating skills. It would help you both to write much more intelligently.
21 edits, and counting. How many more revisions will "
..fact base writing..," or "
...regurgitating past post out of context..." survive? Just asking. Since you are going to be grading my posts from now on, I think it's only fair that I understand the standard to which I will be held.
Separately, about the "misogynist" thing: do you see yourself as a representative end-product of our cultural push to turn girls into men? Because, if so, I'd like to simply rest my case on that topic at this point.
Thank you.