slideby wrote:john, in answer to your question, the post was deleted pior to being able to respond to "mike"
like i said i just stated the facts,sorry if it wasn't what some people wanted to hear.
mike says he knows the man but i bet he doesn't know him as well as he thinks.
1. Have the HB folks requested that you not provide answers now? If so, I encourage you to say so.
2. I know absolutely nothing about the org or the person you posted about. I am only interested in details about this situation because of the severity of the accusations and so that I can attempt to assess whether they have merit or if they are merely the words of someone who is just trying to injure another party. Every single coach in the history of sport at every level has detractors. Even the likes of John Wooden. So I view accusations against a coach that don't provide believable specifics as utterly pointless except for how they reflect on the person posting them anonymously on the internet. OTOH, verfiable details of misdeeds can be helpful/useful to others.
3. No matter where the HB folks draw the line there will be some who don't like it. IMO, they are doing a reasonable job thus far. I have no idea whose opinion (yours or mine) is closest to being right, if such an assessment could even be made.
John