Gawlly gee, I shore dont no wear to even start this humble post. I dont no weather I should be flatered or pist off about the hornets nest eye seam to half stirred up. Eye am jest sum poor HB newbie with only a few post under my belt and all of a sudden I have brought upon myself the wrath of the Zanthian Army.
Augie, I really don't know what to make of your demeaning, holier than thou-pious attitude you spew forth in this thread. Then, to make matters worse, all of your little buddies chime in hoping they might score some brownie points and get to sit next to you at The Burger Hole. I am just some average Joe trying to make a few salient points in a sea of buffoonery. I am confused though. Your first post eloquently and succinctly stated there was no need for me to apologize for the long read because a man of your educational acumen had no time to even finish reading my overly verbose first paragraph. As well as anybody else for that matter. However, you then take it upon yourself to grab that overly-used little red pen of yours and grade the rest of my posts as if my English Lit term paper determined whether I would pass or fail. It seems that you get a little defensive when anybody tries to play in your sand box that is enlightened posts. Why the hostility? Did I come on here and proclaim to be the next McLovin and attempt to steal your spotlight?
You then proceed to state the obvious, at least to those with an inkling of ability to read and comprehend, that "my definition" of extenuating circumstances actually belonged to Mr. Wikipedia. Well done sir. Truly it took someone with immense intelligence to figure out that was "plagiarized" and in fact not my own words. Really, what gave it away? Was it my use of "moral opprobrium" that sealed the deal? In fact, I can scarcely believe that you did not pick up on my additional plagiarism in the next paragraph when I referenced defamation. I thought for sure you would have picked up on the fact that I used a footnote in the middle of my definition as an obvious give-away.
I do not know Mr. Hotwheels but I must confess that I have this mental picture of the stereotypical meathead jock in all of those B movies. I mean anyone who replies to a post with "Game Over" must be wearing a popped-collar pink shirt that is 2 sizes too small and has a barb-wire tatt on his roided out bicep.
I must retire now. I have another fifth of vodka to finish off and I still need to finish reading 'Grammar for Dummies' before I pass out. Before I go, I would like to leave you all with a few mind vitamins. In the spirit of everything Skarp, I would also like to quote the great American Mark Twain, "All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence, and then success is sure." By the way, while everyone has out their red grading pens please be sure to revisit the rules for starting a sentence with And, But or Because. If I remember correctly from my earlier learning days, I believe these words are used primarily to join two independent phrases together and create a relationship between them.
"But try to write like a condescending English professor with that 8th-grade education and folks on here are apt to put you at the head of the idiot class."Finally, and I really mean it this time, I want to dedicate this link to my good friend, Jaquesy, err I mean Skarp, err I mean McLovin, err I mean Augie. It seems that not only does Skarp have ample time to peruse the TX boards of HB (explain to me again why all of you CA people are trolling the TX boards again), but he also has time to blog under the pseudonym of Jaquesy.
http://www.3dbuzz.com/vbforum/blog.php?b=2235GAME OVER

"...and if we don't get some cool rules ourselves, pronto, we'll just be bogus too."