Follow
Donate to HeyBucket.com - Amount:

Welcome Anonymous !

Your Fastpitch Softball Bible
 

Fastpitch Discussions

Anderson Bat Q & A

What's on your mind?

by daylightkate » Tue Sep 08, 2009 8:09 pm

Density
daylightkate
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:51 pm

by dittoz » Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:12 am

Went through that ultra-lightweight thing with the MIDDLE a few years back in baseball. In my days of hitting ignorance, I thought we could cure a bad swing with a -13 bat.

It did...

While he was 11...

Then at 13 when the boys were throwing harder and with more movement he still had a poor swing. It was back to the same old thing so we fixed it with proper swing mechanics. Added to the equation one of the original Anderson baseball Techzillas and it went a long way toward his hitting success. I always felt there was a trade off for the energy created by bat speed versus energy created by mass. The answer is of course, a combination of the two. There is obviously a line where the mass becomes too great to effectively swing, but as I'm sure TB's data will show and his bats have proven, mass definitely adds to the effect.

Unless is so weak as to be unable to swing an average -10 bat, I suspect we'll find that it is more about proper length than it is about ultra-lightweight bats.
Being from NorCal, what do I know anyway???
User avatar
dittoz
 
Posts: 590
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:05 am
Location: Northern CA

by DunninLA » Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:35 am

dittoz -- I agree in a perfect world I'd rather have a 31/22 than a 32/22, but the problem is the huge horizontal strike zone in fastpitch. A hitter must be able to reach a "strike" that is 6-8" off the plate.

That requirement makes the length/weight tradeoff even trickier.
DunninLA
 
Posts: 307
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 8:12 pm

by SnocatzDad » Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:06 am

I saw the Nanotek Slowpitch is available for sale. Is their a projected date for a Nanotek Fastpitch release??
SnocatzDad
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:04 am

by KekambuS » Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:34 am

SnocatzDad wrote:I saw the Nanotek Slowpitch is available for sale. Is their a projected date for a Nanotek Fastpitch release??

Thats a hot question Snoctzdad. I am waiting also.
KekambuS
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:06 pm

by daylightkate » Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:43 pm

Hey TumbleB, put Kekambus out of his misery and let him have a Nanotek. And as a reward to my kind gesture of friendship, may I suggest that you ship one up here to Canuck land? Would have NO issue showing it off around here to everyone :mrgreen:
daylightkate
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:51 pm

by Tumblebug » Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:42 am

daylightkate wrote:Hey TumbleB, put Kekambus out of his misery and let him have a Nanotek. And as a reward to my kind gesture of friendship, may I suggest that you ship one up here to Canuck land? Would have NO issue showing it off around here to everyone :mrgreen:


Kekambus will get his! Do they really play ball that far north?
Tumblebug
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:32 pm

by daylightkate » Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:06 pm

Kekambus will get his! Do they really play ball that far north?


OH MY, THEM'S FIGHTIN WORDS

Image Image
daylightkate
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:51 pm

by KekambuS » Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:08 pm

daylightkate wrote:[quote="Tumblebug Kekambus will get his! Do they really play ball that far north?


OH MY, THEM'S FIGHTIN WORDS

Image Image[/quote]
Looks like an illegal pitch to me.
KekambuS
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:06 pm

by MoeFoes » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:24 pm

DD loves the 08' rocketech. Hits bombs!!!
"Why I Aughta"
MoeFoes
 
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: Ghetto America

PreviousNext

Return to Fastpitch Discussions

cron