RT4ever wrote:Mr. Anderson,
Previously you stated that the break-in period for a Rockettech was anywhere from 25 to 125 impacts, and that the bat will sound different at that time. How does this compare to the break-in time for the Nano? I would imagine that because the material used in the Nano is stronger, more durable, etc., that the break-in time would be longer. I imagine the barrel will make a different sound, as well.
In regards to performance, would it be fair to say that the Nano has more pop than the Rockettech and Techzilla?
You're not really getting the Nano-thing yet. This is not like any technology you have seen before. It is an ultra thin layer of material that becomes part of the underlying substrate at the atomic level and is virtually a single wall design. A single wall bat does not break in, so the Nano is hot out of the wrapper. Because I can strengthen the structure exactly where I want and create a flexural fulcrum wherever I want, I can make it perform in ways I couldn't with other methods. We are exploring the possibilities. The overall performance will be as good or better than the Rocketech with a wider, more forgiving, effective hitting area and the with the durability challenges solved.