Follow
Donate to HeyBucket.com - Amount:

Welcome Anonymous !

Your Fastpitch Softball Bible
 

Fastpitch Discussions

Anderson Bat Q & A

What's on your mind?

by Tumblebug » Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:43 pm

rjd8675309 wrote:This is a very interesting discussion but fails to address the primary question concerning the Anderson fastpitch bats.

The bats are not the specific weight advertised. They are approx. 2.8 oz. heavier than listed.

I was given an explanation by the former engineer that it is the swing weight. Considering I graduated with an advanced engineering degree 25 years ago, there must have been a fundamental change in the laws of physics between then and now.

The basic premise of f=ma is understood, and the application of MOI is correct, but the relevance to rotational velocity is flawed in respect to swing weight. In the case of these bats, the knob is weighted. The theory would be correct if the wrists were the only axis of rotation. I have never seen a batter swing only with his/her wrists. To get to the true physics behind a swing, multiple computations must be used due to multiple rotational axis (body rotation, wrist rotation, etc.).

The bottom line is that the bats are very good and comparable to carbon composites due to the additon weight (f=ma). If the batter can maintain bat speed, the heavier the bat, the better.


Point taken. Let me cogitate on how to best answer your implied question. More later . . .
Tumblebug
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:32 pm

by backstop13 » Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:46 pm

You guys are way over my head now...I just like the cool new paint scheme of the 2010 model. :?
User avatar
backstop13
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:43 am

by jofus » Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:34 pm

Bonus points for using the word "cogitate" 8-)
Proud fastpitch, baseball, volleyball, soccer, basketball, etc. Dad :)
User avatar
jofus
 
Posts: 708
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:01 am

by Tumblebug » Mon Jul 13, 2009 2:10 pm

jofus wrote:Have you ever had anyone complain about a softball sized hole in your Techzillas?

After this weekend, I believe my DD's TZ may have that problem :(

At least her glove didn't have a hole too, so it wasn't all bad 8-)


my understanding is that the hole is self-healing after a little batting practice . . . :D
Tumblebug
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:32 pm

by anonlooker » Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:00 pm

TBug, thank you for the replies to my original set, and all the follow ups. Even more for adding a modicum of intelligent discussion, and lacing it with tremendous wit and humor! :D

So why does a guy working on the most advanced materiel design projects in the world go back to the Stone Age to make bats? Particularly when the market already has several Ruths and Aarons with (and I may be taking a leap here) much greater resources at their disposal?
Don't worry about tomorrow. You did that yesterday.
User avatar
anonlooker
 
Posts: 3114
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 6:14 pm

by Tumblebug » Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:28 pm

rjd8675309 wrote:This is a very interesting discussion but fails to address the primary question concerning the Anderson fastpitch bats.

The bats are not the specific weight advertised. They are approx. 2.8 oz. heavier than listed.

I was given an explanation by the former engineer that it is the swing weight. Considering I graduated with an advanced engineering degree 25 years ago, there must have been a fundamental change in the laws of physics between then and now.

The basic premise of f=ma is understood, and the application of MOI is correct, but the relevance to rotational velocity is flawed in respect to swing weight. In the case of these bats, the knob is weighted. The theory would be correct if the wrists were the only axis of rotation. I have never seen a batter swing only with his/her wrists. To get to the true physics behind a swing, multiple computations must be used due to multiple rotational axis (body rotation, wrist rotation, etc.).

The bottom line is that the bats are very good and comparable to carbon composites due to the additon weight (f=ma). If the batter can maintain bat speed, the heavier the bat, the better.


Okay, let me try it again

The full bat swing movement is a rotation within a rotation. The initial rotation (alpha rotation) is about the center of the body and the weight of the bat in this phase of the swing has a negligible effect on bat speed at impact. The reason for this is that alpha rotation is about the hitter’s center of gravity using very large muscle groups acting as the hips rotate and hands rotate into the zone. Comparing the mass of the body being accelerated in relation to the weight of the bat, the weight of the bat is very minor (2 lb vs. 100 lb) and has little effect on the speed of this alpha rotation.

The small secondary rotation (beta rotation) which happens at the hands begins after the alpha rotation is well under way and includes the shoulders to start, then arms and finally wrists and hands. Batspeed is a combination of the speed of both rotations. This beta rotation uses the smaller muscle groups controlling smaller body mass, wherein the weight of the bat becomes important. However, the weight of the bat only matters in reference to a rotational system. Of course, this weight equivalent is found to be the MOI of the bat with respect to the actual point of bat rotation. Granted, this point of rotation is not at 6 inches into the handle (between the hands) where manufacturers typically make a measurement. The actual point is seen to be somewhere a couple inches off the end of the knob, but neglecting particularly exotic bats, these two measurements of MOI are fairly proportional with respect to beta rotation. As it is this MOI, and not the overall weight of the bat, that has the greatest impact on the energy required to swing the bat, we reference this in speaking of swing weight. It is for this reason that our bats can have different swing weights from their actual weight or from equivalently weighted competitor’s bats.

It is our empirical experience that the way we choose to weight bats results in a superior feel throughout the swing, which corresponds to psychological benefits that produce very real performance benefits that would be difficult to further quantify here in scientific terms. However, regardless of this reason for how we weight our bats, the fact is that the swing weight of the bat is quite separable from the absolute mass of the bat. Further, while F=ma is true, the pseudo-ballistic collision of the bat with the ball results in a very short time of interaction (approximately 1 ms), meaning that energy stored in mass far from the barrel of the bat will be transferred more into vibrational energy of the bat rather than a kinetic event between bat and ball. Additionally, the integral of the velocity of each mass particle of the bat is what will determine the impulse delivered by the bat to the ball. Since my bat knob may be moving at only 25mph while my barrel is moving at 70mph, the mass in the barrel provides a larger impulse contribution than the mass in the knob. This and the factors outlined above are again why the swing weight of the bat (and the efficacy of the bat and ball collision) is quite separable from the absolute mass of the bat.
Tumblebug
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:32 pm

by All About The Socks » Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:35 pm

Tumblebug,

2 months ago, my DD went from a CF3 Black to the green Techzilla and she absolutely loves it. So thank you for engineering a great product. One question though, is it normal for the paint of the bat to wear off so quickly? It is litterally chipping away exposing the silver metal alloy under the paint.

If this is not the norm, is there some type of warranty policy? Thanks in advance.
User avatar
All About The Socks
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 10:42 am

by Tumblebug » Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:56 pm

All About The Socks wrote:Tumblebug,

2 months ago, my DD went from a CF3 Black to the green Techzilla and she absolutely loves it. So thank you for engineering a great product. One question though, is it normal for the paint of the bat to wear off so quickly? It is litterally chipping away exposing the silver metal alloy under the paint.

If this is not the norm, is there some type of warranty policy? Thanks in advance.


There is commonly chipping near the cap but it is usually minor. Excessive chipping or peeling is usually from poor surface preparation in paint. unfortunately, it happens. :oops: If it is excessive, call our service department and we'll take care of it.
Tumblebug
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:32 pm

by Tumblebug » Mon Jul 13, 2009 3:57 pm

Spazsdad wrote:An engineer with a sense of humor. Who'd a thunk it


Shhhhhhh! they'll take my slide rule away if they find out I have a personality! :o
Tumblebug
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:32 pm

by AGameGal » Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:07 pm

Tumblebug wrote:Okay, let me try it again

The full bat swing movement is a rotation within a rotation. The initial rotation (alpha rotation) is about the center of the body and the weight of the bat in this phase of the swing has a negligible effect on bat speed at impact. The reason for this is that alpha rotation is about the hitter’s center of gravity using very large muscle groups acting as the hips rotate and hands rotate into the zone. Comparing the mass of the body being accelerated in relation to the weight of the bat, the weight of the bat is very minor (2 lb vs. 100 lb) and has little effect on the speed of this alpha rotation.

The small secondary rotation (beta rotation) which happens at the hands begins after the alpha rotation is well under way and includes the shoulders to start, then arms and finally wrists and hands. Batspeed is a combination of the speed of both rotations. This beta rotation uses the smaller muscle groups controlling smaller body mass, wherein the weight of the bat becomes important. However, the weight of the bat only matters in reference to a rotational system. Of course, this weight equivalent is found to be the MOI of the bat with respect to the actual point of bat rotation. Granted, this point of rotation is not at 6 inches into the handle (between the hands) where manufacturers typically make a measurement. The actual point is seen to be somewhere a couple inches off the end of the knob, but neglecting particularly exotic bats, these two measurements of MOI are fairly proportional with respect to beta rotation. As it is this MOI, and not the overall weight of the bat, that has the greatest impact on the energy required to swing the bat, we reference this in speaking of swing weight. It is for this reason that our bats can have different swing weights from their actual weight or from equivalently weighted competitor’s bats.

It is our empirical experience that the way we choose to weight bats results in a superior feel throughout the swing, which corresponds to psychological benefits that produce very real performance benefits that would be difficult to further quantify here in scientific terms. However, regardless of this reason for how we weight our bats, the fact is that the swing weight of the bat is quite separable from the absolute mass of the bat. Further, while F=ma is true, the pseudo-ballistic collision of the bat with the ball results in a very short time of interaction (approximately 1 ms), meaning that energy stored in mass far from the barrel of the bat will be transferred more into vibrational energy of the bat rather than a kinetic event between bat and ball. Additionally, the integral of the velocity of each mass particle of the bat is what will determine the impulse delivered by the bat to the ball. Since my bat knob may be moving at only 25mph while my barrel is moving at 70mph, the mass in the barrel provides a larger impulse contribution than the mass in the knob. This and the factors outlined above are again why the swing weight of the bat (and the efficacy of the bat and ball collision) is quite separable from the absolute mass of the bat.


:o :o I can only quote anonlookers signature here.....

I have no idea what you're talking about, so here is a bunny with a pancake on it's head.
"One man practicing good sportsmanship is far better than 50 others preaching it."
-Knute K. Rockne


Authorized Anderson Dealer & Team Deal Specialist
User avatar
AGameGal
 
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:04 am

PreviousNext

Return to Fastpitch Discussions