Follow
Donate to HeyBucket.com - Amount:

Welcome Anonymous !

Your Fastpitch Softball Bible
 

Fastpitch Discussions

Fork and Beans

What's on your mind?

by fastpitchdad05 » Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:45 am

Skarp wrote:
fastpitchdad05 wrote:
Skarp wrote:
fastpitchdad05 wrote:
Skarp wrote:
fastpitchdad05 wrote:What's it going to take for it to be a mountain?

Oh, I dunno...maybe an appreciable risk of injury, for starters. A bleeding brain? Surely you can't be serious. The ball hit him square in the face, and he didn't even flinch.

Ban the coach for life? Prosecute for assault and battery? Withdraw scholarships? Does anyone here actually believe that there was some sort of conspiracy to cause an injury?? Because without such an intent, the reactions posted in this thread, and the punishments suggested, are way overblown. The scorn the softball community is more than enough to correct this coach’s behavior. Anything beyond that is overkill.


Ladies and germs...I submit to you the one (and probably only) time you will see Master Skarp come anywhere near an admission to being wrong.

Yes, believe it or not, that is exactly what this is/was.

It's good to see you grow.

Anyone who has followed my posts on this board at all knows that I haven't the slightest problem with admitting when I'm wrong, or that I'm entirely human and subject to making mistakes just like anyone else. I offer my opinion and analysis, just like anyone else, to be accepted or rejected, agreed or argued with, just like anyone else's.

That said, what in the holy F are you talking about? Where, exactly, in that post, was there anything resembling a retraction or an admission of error?


Gotcha.

Damn. That was easy. You're slippin', dude! :lol:

I'm definitely an asshat magnet. You got me there...


Brilliant! :lol:
User avatar
fastpitchdad05
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 2115
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 1:43 pm

by Skarp » Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:53 am

Battle wrote:I don't think physical harm was the intent.

Of course it wasn't. Nor was it an even remotely probable outcome. Which renders 90% of the posts on this topic ("Off with his head!") pretty much ridiculous...
There is no charge for awesomeness
...or attractiveness.
User avatar
Skarp
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3141
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:10 pm

by anonlooker » Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:10 am

DugoutDad & Hare,
No I don't condone what happened. But nor do I condone the sanctimonious pricks promulgating hysteria for their own smug self-satisfaction. Read MoeFoe's post, and AI's post - once the Law of Unintended Consequences kicks in, all bets are off, and nothing good can come of that. Nor do I think half a million hits on YouTube are good for the sport.

This won't be dealt with on YouTube, or Heybucket, it will be resolved between the parties involved. They have no obligation to air their laundry in public, nor should anyone (of sane mind) expect them to. So really, there's nothing to see here, (other than a few arbiters of supreme justice wiggling their little pitchforks for comic relief. But the Bucket has always been good for that!) Long live Heybucket :lol:
Don't worry about tomorrow. You did that yesterday.
User avatar
anonlooker
 
Posts: 3114
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 6:14 pm

by Sam » Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:13 am

So if the intent of throwing a softball 60 mph at an individual's head was not to injure him.... then....pray tell.....what exactly do you morons think the intent actually was?

This was the coach telling the umpire, "I'll show you, motherf#^ker." He wanted to cause this umpire some pain. He had no idea that the ball would hit the umpire in the mask. It could have hit him in the throat or any other place on his body that was not fully protected. Serious damage wasn't done, but it certainly was very possible.

There isn't any room in the game for people that do this type of thing. They (players included) conspired to hurt another human being because they didn't like the way he was officiating a MEANINGLESS GAME!

I guess some idiots are OK with that.
Run your mouth when I'm not around
Its easy to achieve
You cry to weak friends that sympathize
- Pantera, Walk
User avatar
Sam
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:22 am
Location: Norco, California

by Blind Squirrel » Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:20 am

Hellen.jpg
Helen
Hellen.jpg (30.23 KiB) Viewed 5336 times


Mama always said if you don't have something of value to say, make fun of Helen Keller.

(Helen's half-brother) Tommy Squirrel
10 years from now I'll wish I felt like I do these days.
User avatar
Blind Squirrel
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 1138
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:02 am

by fastpitchdad05 » Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:34 am

Sam wrote:So if the intent of throwing a softball 60 mph at an individual's head was not to injure him.... then....pray tell.....what exactly do you morons think the intent actually was?

This was the coach telling the umpire, "I'll show you, motherf#^ker." He wanted to cause this umpire some pain. He had no idea that the ball would hit the umpire in the mask. It could have hit him in the throat or any other place on his body that was not fully protected. Serious damage wasn't done, but it certainly was very possible.

There isn't any room in the game for people that do this type of thing. They (players included) conspired to hurt another human being because they didn't like the way he was officiating a MEANINGLESS GAME!

I guess some idiots are OK with that.



What he said ^^^^
User avatar
fastpitchdad05
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 2115
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 1:43 pm

by Skarp » Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:38 pm

Sam wrote:So if the intent of throwing a softball 60 mph at an individual's head was not to injure him.... then....pray tell.....what exactly do you morons think the intent actually was?

This was the coach telling the umpire, "I'll show you, motherf#^ker." He wanted to cause this umpire some pain. He had no idea that the ball would hit the umpire in the mask. It could have hit him in the throat or any other place on his body that was not fully protected. Serious damage wasn't done, but it certainly was very possible.

There isn't any room in the game for people that do this type of thing. They (players included) conspired to hurt another human being because they didn't like the way he was officiating a MEANINGLESS GAME!

I guess some idiots are OK with that.

"Conspired to hurt another human being"? That's absurd. Umpires are geared up to protect themselves from balls deflected at every angle and thrown by the likes of Jenny Finch. If it is "certainly very possible" that a ball thrown straight down the pipe by a 16 or 17 year old girl will cause injury to the ump, then there's a much more important issue that we ought to be discussing.

They "conspired" to send a message. Nothing more. Was it acceptable? No. Should it be condoned? Absolutely not. But nor does it remotely justify the forming of a lynch mob. But then some idiots are okay with lynch mobs.
There is no charge for awesomeness
...or attractiveness.
User avatar
Skarp
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3141
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:10 pm

by fastpitchdad05 » Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:57 pm

Skarp wrote:
Sam wrote:So if the intent of throwing a softball 60 mph at an individual's head was not to injure him.... then....pray tell.....what exactly do you morons think the intent actually was?

This was the coach telling the umpire, "I'll show you, motherf#^ker." He wanted to cause this umpire some pain. He had no idea that the ball would hit the umpire in the mask. It could have hit him in the throat or any other place on his body that was not fully protected. Serious damage wasn't done, but it certainly was very possible.

There isn't any room in the game for people that do this type of thing. They (players included) conspired to hurt another human being because they didn't like the way he was officiating a MEANINGLESS GAME!

I guess some idiots are OK with that.

"Conspired to hurt another human being"? That's absurd. Umpires are geared up to protect themselves from balls deflected at every angle and thrown by the likes of Jenny Finch. If it is "certainly very possible" that a ball thrown straight down the pipe by a 16 or 17 year old girl will cause injury to the ump, then there's a much more important issue that we ought to be discussing.

They "conspired" to send a message. Nothing more. Was it acceptable? No. Should it be condoned? Absolutely not. But nor does it remotely justify the forming of a lynch mob. But then some idiots are okay with lynch mobs.


"The great and powerful Skarp has spoken!

Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain..."
User avatar
fastpitchdad05
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 2115
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 1:43 pm

by jtat32 » Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:06 pm

How the hell can we have an intelligent discussion about this when we keep cycling back to the "idiots who are OK with this"?

If someone has expressed an opinion that they are OK with this, please use the quote function to identify where this was said. If you do so, be careful to consider the context of the statement you are quoting, because it is easy for others to subsequently use the quote function to show that you are an idiot with poor reading comprehension or analytical thinking skills.

Either way, we can move on from this particular point with the knowledge that:

- Yes, there are some idiots in this discussion who are OK with this.

or

- We are in 100% agreement with this, but differ in opinion on what the consequences should be. If this is the case, any further reference to those that are OK with this would be idiotic.

After we do this we can move on to more interesting discussions:

- What should be the consequences of this?

Personally, I'm not all that interested in this discussion. I have a general opinion on parameters, but this case doesn't affect me directly and my opinion won't affect anything.

- How do these things come about?
- What are the responsibilities of all of those involved (coaches, umpires, players, and parents) to make sure things like this don't happen in the future.
- What do we learn from this that we can individually apply to make the sport an even better experience?

These are the questions that I'm much more interested in discussing.
User avatar
jtat32
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 456
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 1:53 am

by Skarp » Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:26 pm

jtat32 wrote:These are the questions that I'm much more interested in discussing.

What, you mean useful, substantive discourse? When it's so much easier to simply label the opposition as stupid and evil? What antiquated backwater do you hail from, pray tell? You're clearly way behind the times...
There is no charge for awesomeness
...or attractiveness.
User avatar
Skarp
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3141
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:10 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Fastpitch Discussions