DonnieS wrote:Spazsdad wrote:Of course they did.
A lawyer. Lawyers have abolished the need for common sense in society.
Dead on.
) ... But in some cases they are like weed killers which wouldn't be necessary if we didn't have weeds ... There are people who discriminate against anyone who is not like them ... It sucks that we have to have laws that should be covered by common sense ... But common sense is not very common ...
GIMNEPIWO wrote:... But common sense is not very common ...
DonnieS wrote:GIMNEPIWO wrote:... But common sense is not very common ...
I always wondered why it was called "common". Now that I work for the government, I am baffled.
Maybe if the government made it a law we would all have it ? 
GIMNEPIWO wrote:DonnieS wrote:GIMNEPIWO wrote:... But common sense is not very common ...
I always wondered why it was called "common". Now that I work for the government, I am baffled.
Skarp wrote:Mandating equal participatory access to individuals who are, by definition, less equally able to participate? That's like allowing women to vote. Idiotic.
Dugout Dad wrote:Skarp wrote:Mandating equal participatory access to individuals who are, by definition, less equally able to participate? That's like allowing women to vote. Idiotic.
It speaks!!
Ahhhh ... If you build it, they will come ...Skarp wrote:Mandating equal participatory access to individuals who are, by definition, less equally able to participate? That's like allowing women to vote. Idiotic.
GIMNEPIWO wrote:I hate Lawyers more than anyone ( except for Skarp
DonnieS wrote:Skarp wrote:Mandating equal participatory access to individuals who are, by definition, less equally able to participate? That's like allowing women to vote. Idiotic.
Come on now, we arent going to take it that far.
