Follow
Donate to HeyBucket.com - Amount:

Welcome Anonymous !

Your Fastpitch Softball Bible
 

The Pub

Bend over obama voters - enjoy it

Off topic. Home for jokes and other misc. stuff.
Keep it reasonable.

by as the world turns » Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:36 am

Workers making $30,000 will take a bigger hit on their pay than those earning $500,000 under new fiscal deal

It is just the start......

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2256972/Middle-earners-hit-hardest-revealed-workers-making-30-000-bigger-hit-earning-500-000-new-fiscal-deal.html
“Life is hard; it's harder if you're stupid.” John Wayne
User avatar
as the world turns
 
Posts: 1519
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:54 am

by fastpitchdad05 » Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:57 am

as the world turns wrote:Workers making $30,000 will take a bigger hit on their pay than those earning $500,000 under new fiscal deal

It is just the start......

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2256972/Middle-earners-hit-hardest-revealed-workers-making-30-000-bigger-hit-earning-500-000-new-fiscal-deal.html


Thanks ATWT, that's an informative article. However, the headline seems a little misleading. Reading down the article a bit it states:

While the lower brackets will take a bigger hit to their paychecks than those in the $200,000 to $500,000 bucket, their overall federal tax rate will remain smaller

The average increase in tax bills for all earners will be about $1,257.

While the lower brackets will take a bigger hit to their paychecks than those in the $200,000 to $500,000 bucket, their overall federal tax rate will remain smaller. And the biggest hit of all will still be felt by the nation's top income earners.

Obama made a tax hike on the nation's wealthiest central to his campaign for re-election.

Workers making more than $1 million will pay an average 7.8 percent more - or an additional $170,341 - under the new law.

The federal tax rate will be roughly 39 percent for that group, compared to 26 percent for those earning between $200,000 and $500,000 and 14 percent for those making between $40,000 and $50,000.
User avatar
fastpitchdad05
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 2115
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 1:43 pm

by thebigshow » Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:58 am

I'll say it again, I can't find anyone who admits they voted for this guy. That' goes for asking at work ( which has 50% number of blacks ), the ball fields, fitness facilities, church, family, friends, friends of friends............

I just don't get it.
thebigshow
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:57 am

by as the world turns » Fri Jan 04, 2013 12:27 pm

fastpitchdad05 wrote:
as the world turns wrote:Workers making $30,000 will take a bigger hit on their pay than those earning $500,000 under new fiscal deal

It is just the start......

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2256972/Middle-earners-hit-hardest-revealed-workers-making-30-000-bigger-hit-earning-500-000-new-fiscal-deal.html


Thanks ATWT, that's an informative article. However, the headline seems a little misleading. Reading down the article a bit it states:

While the lower brackets will take a bigger hit to their paychecks than those in the $200,000 to $500,000 bucket, their overall federal tax rate will remain smaller

The average increase in tax bills for all earners will be about $1,257.

While the lower brackets will take a bigger hit to their paychecks than those in the $200,000 to $500,000 bucket, their overall federal tax rate will remain smaller. And the biggest hit of all will still be felt by the nation's top income earners.

Obama made a tax hike on the nation's wealthiest central to his campaign for re-election.

Workers making more than $1 million will pay an average 7.8 percent more - or an additional $170,341 - under the new law.

The federal tax rate will be roughly 39 percent for that group, compared to 26 percent for those earning between $200,000 and $500,000 and 14 percent for those making between $40,000 and $50,000.

But, what happened to "only the top 2% would get a tax increase". The low information obama voter actually thought they would not see an increase at all because O said so - surprise, dipsh*ts! :lol:
“Life is hard; it's harder if you're stupid.” John Wayne
User avatar
as the world turns
 
Posts: 1519
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:54 am

by fastpitchdad05 » Fri Jan 04, 2013 12:36 pm

as the world turns wrote:
fastpitchdad05 wrote:
as the world turns wrote:Workers making $30,000 will take a bigger hit on their pay than those earning $500,000 under new fiscal deal

It is just the start......

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2256972/Middle-earners-hit-hardest-revealed-workers-making-30-000-bigger-hit-earning-500-000-new-fiscal-deal.html


Thanks ATWT, that's an informative article. However, the headline seems a little misleading. Reading down the article a bit it states:

While the lower brackets will take a bigger hit to their paychecks than those in the $200,000 to $500,000 bucket, their overall federal tax rate will remain smaller

The average increase in tax bills for all earners will be about $1,257.

While the lower brackets will take a bigger hit to their paychecks than those in the $200,000 to $500,000 bucket, their overall federal tax rate will remain smaller. And the biggest hit of all will still be felt by the nation's top income earners.

Obama made a tax hike on the nation's wealthiest central to his campaign for re-election.

Workers making more than $1 million will pay an average 7.8 percent more - or an additional $170,341 - under the new law.

The federal tax rate will be roughly 39 percent for that group, compared to 26 percent for those earning between $200,000 and $500,000 and 14 percent for those making between $40,000 and $50,000.

But, what happened to "only the top 2% would get a tax increase". The low information obama voter actually thought they would not see an increase at all because O said so - surprise, dipsh*ts! :lol:


Perhaps this was a concession for the Dems getting most of what they wanted. Seems like a small sacrifice on the Dems part and a huge concession by the 'Pubs.
User avatar
fastpitchdad05
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 2115
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 1:43 pm

by Dugout Dad » Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:23 pm

fastpitchdad05 wrote:Perhaps this was a concession for the Dems getting most of what they wanted. Seems like a small sacrifice on the Dems part and a huge concession by the 'Pubs.


Here is a picture translation to what you just said. Me thinks spending is the problem and not enough of it happened.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-01-01/putting-americas-tax-hike-perspective
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.
Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill (1874-1965)

You can understand capitalism when you realize that Thomas Edison improved the world more than Karl Marx
Me
User avatar
Dugout Dad
 
Posts: 2334
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:46 pm

by fastpitchdad05 » Fri Jan 04, 2013 2:56 pm

Dugout Dad wrote:
fastpitchdad05 wrote:Perhaps this was a concession for the Dems getting most of what they wanted. Seems like a small sacrifice on the Dems part and a huge concession by the 'Pubs.


Here is a picture translation to what you just said. Me thinks spending is the problem and not enough of it happened.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-01-01/putting-americas-tax-hike-perspective


I agree. Way too much frivolous spending.

It's almost as if my wife was in charge of the national budget! :lol:
User avatar
fastpitchdad05
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 2115
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 1:43 pm

by jonriv » Fri Jan 04, 2013 3:03 pm

fastpitchdad05 wrote:
Dugout Dad wrote:
fastpitchdad05 wrote:Perhaps this was a concession for the Dems getting most of what they wanted. Seems like a small sacrifice on the Dems part and a huge concession by the 'Pubs.


Here is a picture translation to what you just said. Me thinks spending is the problem and not enough of it happened.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-01-01/putting-americas-tax-hike-perspective


I agree. Way too much frivolous spending.

It's almost as if my wife was in charge of the national budget! :lol:


For your sake I hope she is not on the Bucket!! :o
User avatar
jonriv
 
Posts: 4875
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 6:01 am
Location: Connecticut

by fastpitchdad05 » Fri Jan 04, 2013 3:09 pm

jonriv wrote:
fastpitchdad05 wrote:
Dugout Dad wrote:
fastpitchdad05 wrote:Perhaps this was a concession for the Dems getting most of what they wanted. Seems like a small sacrifice on the Dems part and a huge concession by the 'Pubs.


Here is a picture translation to what you just said. Me thinks spending is the problem and not enough of it happened.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-01-01/putting-americas-tax-hike-perspective


I agree. Way too much frivolous spending.

It's almost as if my wife was in charge of the national budget! :lol:


For your sake I hope she is not on the Bucket!! :o


She isn't since she retired from coaching last summer, but I'm sure someone will narc me out that knows her.

Yikes! :o
User avatar
fastpitchdad05
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 2115
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 1:43 pm

by Dugout Dad » Fri Jan 04, 2013 3:44 pm

fastpitchdad05 wrote:
Dugout Dad wrote:
fastpitchdad05 wrote:Perhaps this was a concession for the Dems getting most of what they wanted. Seems like a small sacrifice on the Dems part and a huge concession by the 'Pubs.


Here is a picture translation to what you just said. Me thinks spending is the problem and not enough of it happened.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-01-01/putting-americas-tax-hike-perspective


I agree. Way too much frivolous spending.

It's almost as if my wife was in charge of the national budget! :lol:

I don't know her, but I would trust her over the buffoons in office now.
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.
Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill (1874-1965)

You can understand capitalism when you realize that Thomas Edison improved the world more than Karl Marx
Me
User avatar
Dugout Dad
 
Posts: 2334
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:46 pm

Next

Return to The Pub