jonriv wrote:TheCloser wrote:Equal pay, really? Can you imagine the legal precedent this would set?
Does this mean that powerhouse schools like UCLA will now have to pay the same for a men's basketball coach as their women's basketball coach. This makes absolutely no sense.
UCONN basketball coaches(Men & Wormen's) are paid a similar amount
In many ways- the women have been more successful a the men
Trust me, I have a DD, love softball and fully support women's sports but at the end of the day the big TV contracts and money mostly comes from men's sports. It's stupid to think that the softball coach at Cal State Fullerton should make as much money as the men's baseball coach just because she thinks she should. Her argument that the Equal Pay Act applies will not hold in court.
For coaching positions, what should be paid is a market value rate for the position. In your UCONN example, the market rate would probably result in a similar salary.



























