by JimineyCricket » Fri Dec 07, 2012 11:59 pm
A consistent theme at the top of the list seems to be roster stability. Grapettes K, Hype, Storm, Team CA - all keeping rosters pretty much static. Seems like the right approach - find the players (and parents) that work for you, and develop from within. Unfortunately, movement happens. So I have to ask the more experienced coaches out there - if you're a succesful second year 12u team with 2-4 (non-pitcher) openings, are you better off taking raw but promising new-to-"A"-ball players you can develop, or do you take the established "A" ball players that are looking for a new team because of parent-related drama? On the field, one group is going to take some work, one group is plug-and-play. Another way of asking is what hurts a successful core more - 25% of your roster coming in needing work, but with no history of issues, or 25% of your roster being established players coming in as a group from a drama factory? The answer may help us project where some of the other top programs that experienced such roster developments (Rapids, KG Hitters, Breeze, Lady Magic, etc.) may be heading.