watchtonsofsoftball wrote:Man some of you need to give your DD some credit and maybe yourself too. Talk about drinking of the Kool Aid. And I've seen some affiliation on this site so there SOME conflict of interest it seems. On Deck is nice but $150 x 160+ kids? A lot of coin. Great people and have talked to them several times. I love what they do but I wish they would target some middle of the road kids who are above average but may not get the exposure they need.These kids that are good, dont need anybodies help. If they are doing the work, they obviously have the skills, they will be fine. The girl going to LSU, if she visited the school and went to their camp while there, would have been same result I'm guessing. Not to mention a better informed decision. Cant tell you how many kids I've seen go back east without ever visiting the school. On Deck in my opinion is for the kid who maybe isnt on the radar yet who is on a low level showcase team not getting much exposure. Any kid on the batbusters, minors gold, Sorcerers, A's,So Cal Anything really doesnt need On Deck. I've been to several of them and I think they are great but its funny to me how many people swear that they are the must go to if you want to go to a big time school. They provide a good camp but there is so much more to the recruiting process. Many schools are starting to gear toward their own prospect camps over 2 days to make a better evaluation on a kids future potential. Thats all the recruiting process is. How much better will your DD get and will they help the team in the future. We had several friends DD's attend their camps with literally a 50/50 split. Emails from coaches are nice but they mean jack. Real interest is when you go to a camp and they pull you aside or your travel coach says you need to visit this school. Everything else is a big net that schools cast to see what sticks.
WOW!
#1- "If you play on ANY SoCal team you dont need OnDeck"
Its funny how I know a ton of kids down South that are late in the recruiting game that have no home yet that would cut off a little finger to get in to a OnDeck camp
#2- "If you play for Sorcerers you dont need OnDeck"
Its funny how I know several Sorcerers that are still looking for home, matter of fact one of them for sure attended OnDeck in Stockton
#3- "A kids future potential is all the recruiting process is"
Now I am not even going to comment as this is the BEST of them all, well wait maybe just a tidbit, so a kids transcript, SAT, ATTITUDE and kids family value's have nothing to do with recruiting at all. I know kids whose parents were put through the gauntlet before a offer was made just to see what parents are like, as the old saying holds true, "apple does not fall far from the tree". TONS of kids with potential but not all of them have the "pkg", so its a tough job as a college coach to dig into a recruit to see what that kid is made of and parents as well.
As far as coin the Allisters make, REALLY, do you know how many weekends they spend on the road evaluating talent for ZERO cash, cmon man. Do you know how many camps they could have a year if it was really about the bank account, alot more than the five or six they are up to now.
As far as the 160 kids, I have no idea where this came from. Sure the NorCal event has been expanded to near a 100, to do exactly what the Allisters feel is needed, getting the middle of the road kid exposed. Let me ask you, as a majority at last NorCal event, what do you feel was the level of talent, High, middle of the road, or low?
Lastly, if you felt your kid was a blue chipper but just did not have the exposure yet and was say a freshman and was invited to the OnDeck National camp where a 100 of the top schools plant there butts and dont move for two days and watch, do you think you would say NAhhh, lets just write some letters and go to a couple evaluation camps, and we are good to go?