by slapperdad » Fri May 25, 2012 7:50 am
The biggest issue I'd say is that a LOT of the coaches voting have NEVER seen these players play. They have to rely on colleagues and people who they trust. I have seen both of the players mentioned in this year's running, but I've seen them in the summer playing travel ball. I have never seen them play a high school game. When we vote at district meetings it's made perfectly clear to us, at least in my meeting, the voting is based on THIS YEAR'S HIGH SCHOOL SEASON. So ethically that puts me in a quandary doesn't it. I do what I think is the right thing for the kids, ultimately that's what I'm here for right? Is it right or wrong, I don't know, but I have no problem sleeping at night.
The other side of the coin is I may not be in the majority, I see a ton of travel ball in the summer and fall, what about the coaches who don't? What about the coaches who see their team and whoever they happen to be playing? What about the ones who just vote because that's who their buddy told them to vote for?
Is the system flawed, yes, I'm anxious to hear a better way though. For the most part, I think they get it right, will there be arguments, absolutely. Are their times you could make a case for 2, 3, or more kids, sure. But I don't think there's ever been a kid who received the award that didn't deserve it.
Every man lives by a code:
1.Always look cool
2.Never get lost
3.If you get lost, look cool