by coolstuff » Thu Dec 11, 2008 7:23 am
Fascinating....
I like reading between the lines in these situations. What isn't said is as important as what was said, and sometimes it all comes down to miscommunication.
There is obviously the usual inherent animosity between the rec league and the local travel teams. Doesn't this happen everywhere? When my DD left rec to go to travel, I know that some parents were ticked off and to this day won't speak to me.
In light of that underlying tension, and knowing that there have been a history of more apparent issues between the rec and travel orgs, why didn't Scott get a written agreement with everything spelled out? There are conflicting accounts on whether or not Scott had permission to use the storage area, and this would not be an issue if there was something in writing. Yes, one would hope that everyone would act honorably on a hand-shake deal, but even among friends things can go horribly wrong.
In the abscence of anything in writing, I wonder if Dave and Adrian spoke among themselves what the expectations were. Dave's presence on Saturday gave tacit approval of the use of the storage area. Adrian showed up Sunday morning thinking that the travel teams didn't have permission. Recipe for disaster.
I find it interesting that Adrian doesn't explain, or even mention, that he turned on the sprinklers, only stating that he didn't 'vandalize' the fields. Oh, he knew what he was doing. He knew that by temporarily flooding the fields, he was causing at the very least hours of delay of the friendly, if not outright cancellation of Sunday's games, and embarassment and headaches for the hosting travel team. He knew that the fields would drain in time to be used that afternoon. It was a calculated and immature action.
Ultimately, I think this goes right back to the historical tension between travel and rec organizations who compete for players and facility use. No matter what the facts are in this situation, the BPGSA board can now decide that it's just too much of a hassle to let travel teams use "their" fields. And we really don't know what kind of agreement BPGSA has with the city parks dept.
FYI - the softball fields in my area are under different jurisdictions. The city and county parks, various township boards, city and county schools, and the local Eagles all have fields under their control, and some are more controlling than others. Rec leagues are usually accommodated more readily than travel teams, but I've seen some "good ol' boy" agreements between a parks dept. and a travel team at the detriment to the general public.
My DD's travel team has a private field and pole barn. Sweet.