So my father-in-law is much older than me (obviously), and therefore is as smart as DD and knows everything. In a debate, God would have met his match.
So I am having a little trouble with this call.
2 strikes on the batter, NFHS. Pitch is eye level, batter twitches shoulders a little, and PU rings her up for a swinging strike. Obviously a home-town call, but in my opinion, there is nothing to be done to continue the at bat.
FIL insists the coach should have appealed for the BU to see if he would reverse the call. Says he has seen appeals of this nature on various levels many times. He variously insists that this is the same as an appeal of check swing/"ball" and/or the rarer occasion when the PU on his own accord says "Partner, did she go?" or similar. FIL continues that the call was so bad that PU should know it was a marginal call, and should therefore be open to an appeal from base coach. Even when I tried to explain there is no appeal on a swinging strike (such as this example), he still insists the PU could and should go for help. The fact that the base coach did attempt to get PU to ask for help, and was told that he (PU) would not consider any discussion, appeal, or help on a swinging strike, is lost on FIL (coach is so lost that this effort is not surprising). I just could not seem to get it across that there was nothing (appropriate) that could be done.
Is there a specific rule (NFHS or ASA equivalent) that answers this specific situation, since experience and common sense don't seem to factor in for FIL? (The basic rule that a batter is out on the 3rd strike won't help)


























