AlwaysImprove wrote:Actually my daughter does not hit, she is a pitcher. No need to cheat. When she did hit, we did not use any of these bats.
Who said they did or even suggest that you did cheat? I would suggest you try reading and responding to what is written, but we all know better than that since you often cannot support your argument with anything other than your opinion and perception.
Are you arguing Nike bat was not hot?
Don't know, don't care. If it was approved, it is approved. If Nike wants it used in NCAA ball, they submit the name and model to the NCAA for inclusion on their list just like every other manufacturer. The requirement for a bat to be eligible to be on the list is that it is ASA approved with a 2004 certification stamp and not be on the Non-approved List
That's it, the same as NFHS and ASA, though ASA allows bats with the 2000 certification.
NCAA created a system to rid itself of those bats correct?
The NCAA created a system so they could have a procedure in place over which they had control. What does the NCAA do that ASA does not do on a regular bases? All of the ASA championship play in my state and many others have applied a BCT to each bat used in every game. Local ASA association even tests bats for local leagues. No big deal, that is until the NCAA does it, then you act like it was the second coming of Ronald Reagan.