by Bretman » Sun Aug 15, 2010 6:53 am
Saw a little bit of this game, but not the play in question. Sight unseen, it sounds like a blown call.
Forget the explanation given by the announcers, as it is completely false. So long as the fielder had both feet established in a live ball area before making the catch, it should be a valid catch. A fielder could be on the run, leap in the air, catch the ball, then land in dead ball area and it would be a catch for an out.
The only way the NFHS rule differs from the ASA rule is in how a collapsed fence is handled. In ASA a collapsed fence lying on the ground becomes an extension of live ball territory. A fielder standing on the collapsed fence is considered to be in live ball area. She isn't in dead ball area until she touches the ground past the fence.
In NFHS, when the fence is lying on the ground in dead ball area, it becomes part of the dead ball area. Thus, a fielder standing on a fence that is "horizontal" (ie: pushed outward and lying on the ground) has established herself in dead ball area and the catch would not be valid.
Just going by the description provided, if the fielder was making the catch as she contacted the fence, and the fence was not lying on the ground contacting dead ball area, this is an out. Once the player contacts the area beyond the fence, the ball becomes dead. If it was not the third out, any baserunners on base would be awarded one base (treated as an unintentional "catch and carry").