MTR wrote:How can wood bats be a "dumb" alternative since that is the initial piece of equipment used in the game? Actually, it was aluminum which is the alternative.
Aluminum is fine, but that is where all this cheating in softball started. Even the term single-wall or double-wall were debatable and complete relied upon the manufacturer's honest marking. How's that worked for the game lately?
With all of today's scientific advancements, why can there not be a composite wood bat?
If you have noticed some of the debate, many believe wood isn't good because of performance, physical capabilities and mechanics. IOW, the players are not as capable as those who played 20-30 years ago with wood bats or even the early aluminum when the average bat was 34-38 ounces. Today, many players think 30 ounce bats are sledgehammers.
There are numerous wood-bat slowpitch tournaments and leagues and believe it or not, the players have a blast! Imagine that, bringing the game back to where it belongs and having fun doing it. Who would have thunk it?
Where is the problem in players learning to play the game instead of concentrating on out-purchasing/out-cheating the opponent?
Great argument if this were a discussion about baseball. Slo pitch isn't a good example because you can load up with a 4 frame swing that wouldn't allow you to hit a good 10U pitcher in fastpitch.
Softballs fly half as far as baseballs. The game would be unwatchable in my opinion. Goodbye slap game.



























