jonriv wrote:AI- sorry for the weak response

Just had two bourbons and was limited on my iphone
Do I think Nuveman should take the blame- no, but what she said certainly is a catalyst. Also, since as you said her statement probably represents the thoughts of a lot of coaches.
I do not think masks should be made mandatory, but players should not be discouraged wearing them either. I guess what puzzles me is why players would not have the maskes on? They have worn them their whole playing careers until college-why change?
As for the frequency of being hit in the face- I see the foul tip to the face variety quite often(thankfully with a mask in place)
Four bourbons might explain it. A catalyst that's just as rich. Very official tone, like putting a moniker on someone. Sorry if I find the pitchforking entertaining. Someone tried to
catalyst moniker me one time, and it still cracks me thinking of it.
To answer your question, why players might now choose to not have masks. I suspect they do a fairly level headed analysis of the risk reward math.
Despite claims here, mostly discounted as they are full of hyperbolic claims of mass destruction. I have watched the thousands of games and never seen a foul ball to a player not wearing a mask.
Someone made the claim that foul balls to players with masks happen all the time. I suspect this is like gear in football. Once you have the gear on you are way more likely to take the additional risk the gear affords you. Most studies currently show the better they make the gear, the harder the impacts become. The overall injury rate remains consistent. According to archaeology, they remain fairly consistent going back a very long time. I suspect that girls with masks on are not as concerned about the ball hitting the part of the bat that will come up and in on them.
It is for that very reason that I would encourage the use of a mask. It let's hitters stay after a pitch that is a bit inside and has gottten a bit above the hands. Staying with it longer may allow them to do something with that pitch.
Yes, I have heard of these accidents, but you have to be realistic. The UTEP incident, a Huskies player 8 years ago. But it is not like it is 10 a year, or even 1 a year. It happens once every few years. I am not talking about the light knock on the nose, which produces a very bloody scene, but does no real damage. I am talking about 6 months off types of injuries.
On most college teams, ankles, knees, colar bones, fingers, you see about two of those a year. So it is going to take a lot more than a bloody nose, a broken nose or knot on the head to register.
I can tell you without out a hint of doubt, at the upper college levels. If you step up to the plate with that Lewis Nix looking mask I showed on the earlier post, you are going to get your first pitch low and inside. Inside cause they think you are afraid of the ball, low cause they think you cannot see it. At this level, they are likely right on both counts.
I can also 100% confirm for you that despite the
catalyst moniker you have cast, the next kid hit the face in this fashion is not in any way shape or form have anything to do with Nuveman. No more than Ozzy's Suicide Solution song was causing youth's to commit suicide. If people are just not taking your
catalyst moniker all that seriously, dont' be gettin too butt hurt.