Follow
Donate to HeyBucket.com - Amount:

Welcome Anonymous !

Your Fastpitch Softball Bible
 

Fastpitch Discussions

New Year New Bat

What's on your mind?

by SSdad » Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:46 pm

no, the blue one. I am not to sure about the clear ones. Seems like the break in is going to be up to interpretation on those.
It's better to keep your mouth shut and look like you're stupid......
than to open it and remove all doubt.
User avatar
SSdad
 
Posts: 719
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:15 am

by Hawk17 » Thu Aug 14, 2008 3:42 pm

Easton says you can see when the new bat is too hot because there will be white spots on the clear outside...just what you want, a bat that screams that it's no longer legal!
Hawk17
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 7:51 am

by Skarp » Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:00 pm

Hawk17 wrote:Easton says you can see when the new bat is too hot because there will be white spots on the clear outside...just what you want, a bat that screams that it's no longer legal!

Just what I was thinking when I heard that. And who's to say that the bat actually is illegal (i.e., too hot) at that point? It's not like there will be a way to verify it. Sounds like planned obsolescence to me.
There is no charge for awesomeness
...or attractiveness.
User avatar
Skarp
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3141
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:10 pm

by anonlooker » Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:12 pm

With the quality and service of Anderson available, why would anyone buy an Easton?
Don't worry about tomorrow. You did that yesterday.
User avatar
anonlooker
 
Posts: 3114
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 6:14 pm

by wadeintothem » Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:46 pm

Let's see..

Mr. Easton didnt vote, a main cause of softball getting pulled from the 2012 olympics and possibly/probably beyond.

OK.. so obviously, thats not enough to cause you to look at other bats like Anderson..

Their bats suck and hundreds were tossed at Nationals.

Why anyone would even think of Easton is beyond me.
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
User avatar
wadeintothem
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:44 pm

by wadeintothem » Thu Aug 14, 2008 6:24 pm

Spazsdad wrote:I guess your post is directed at my comment regarding Anderson bats. I was replying to the previous poster that praised Anderson's customer service and quality which I did not dispute. They have a great reputation in the market. I have no problem with Anderson, I believe they make a fine product, it's just not for everybody, that's all.

"Mr. Easton didn't vote, a main cause of softball getting pulled from the 2012 olympics and possibly/probably beyond."
As far as beating the dead horse over JE's lack of voting, baseball and softball's demise from the Olympics was a foregone conclusion. Study the time line and you will see how things transpired.

"OK.. so obviously, that's not enough to cause you to look at other bats like Anderson.."
And you are correct, JE's vote has not and will not have any bearing on which piece of sports equipment I purchase.

"Their bats suck and hundreds were tossed at Nationals."
Their synergy line of 1 piece composites have had no problems and continue to perform well on the field.

Now that I appear to be a shill for Easton I will sit back and prepare to get slammed by all of the anti Easton posts :)

ps my DD swings a Phenix


Actually, it wasnt directed to you but to Easton and anyone thinking Easton in General! :)
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
User avatar
wadeintothem
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:44 pm

by L84DNR » Thu Aug 14, 2008 6:26 pm

wadeintothem wrote:Let's see..

Mr. Easton didnt vote, a main cause of softball getting pulled from the 2012 olympics and possibly/probably beyond.

OK.. so obviously, thats not enough to cause you to look at other bats like Anderson..

Their bats suck and hundreds were tossed at Nationals.

Why anyone would even think of Easton is beyond me.


Oh I dont know, because they have been banging the heck out of the ball with them for years? Uhh, I seem to recall every other girl in the recent college world series using Stealth's or Synergy's, must be junk?
Oh and by the way, DD has had rocket techs and pummeled them within a few weeks with
"performance waves" rendering them useless.
Just picked up the new Synergy and she love's it.
User avatar
L84DNR
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 10:17 pm

by wadeintothem » Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:02 pm

L84DNR wrote:
wadeintothem wrote:Let's see..

Mr. Easton didnt vote, a main cause of softball getting pulled from the 2012 olympics and possibly/probably beyond.

OK.. so obviously, thats not enough to cause you to look at other bats like Anderson..

Their bats suck and hundreds were tossed at Nationals.

Why anyone would even think of Easton is beyond me.


Oh I dont know, because they have been banging the heck out of the ball with them for years? Uhh, I seem to recall every other girl in the recent college world series using Stealth's or Synergy's, must be junk?
Oh and by the way, DD has had rocket techs and pummeled them within a few weeks with
"performance waves" rendering them useless.
Just picked up the new Synergy and she love's it.


Meet new bat.

Same as the old bat.

Techzilla, Synergy, Rocket tech, etc.. all the top of the line bats perform (if legal) at about the max 98 mph.

In the lab, their performance is at about the same level.

So you have a choice as to what color she likes or the bat de jour.

Real test is quality.

Stealth has MAJOR issues. Phoenix has issues. I've not seen any probs with Anderson bats (since the great rivet debacle) or Synergy or Techzilla.

If you had probs with Rocket techs, thats nothing but 1 report.. many others, including top d1 do fine with them.

If there was a truly #1 legal bat.

EVERY top player would be using the exact same bat.

So, with all that, its appropriate to at least mention eastons major part in getting softball dumped from the Olympics... since many other bats are as good or better.
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
User avatar
wadeintothem
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:44 pm

Previous

Return to Fastpitch Discussions