blackwidow wrote:jtat32..your post seems really angry in a sarcastic sort of way. I wonder if you have a personal investment in this coach or this team?
Angry - not really, but it does irritate me when adults call out kids on a board like this. The OP said they were "a bad group of girls". That's a pretty strong statement. Even more irritating was the stupidity of extending this judgement to the girls that weren't even involved in the action and justifying it based on completely speculative evidence. Actually, now that I think about it, it does make me angry, but I'll get over it.
I have no investment in this particular team, or coach. We don't live in SoCal.
blackwidow wrote:Are you saying that people do not have the right or the obligation to judge what they see on that video?
I never said anything remotely near this, but since you asked, I'll give you my opinion:
You, or anyone else, has the
right to judge whatever the hell you/they want to. I also have a
right to pass judgement on your/their judgement.
Neither you, nor anyone else has an
obligation to judge anything. If you truly feel that it is your obligation to express your judgement on things, and it would come as no surprise to anyone on this board if you do, you may find some relief knowing that it isn't. I'm sure that there are many that wouldn't mind at all if you didn't.
blackwidow wrote:Are you saying that anyone who passes judgement is self-rightious?
In a literal sense, yes, one would necessitate the other. In a more colloquial sense, also yes, judging a coach, two young women, and their teammates, as "bad" people based solely on one incident that is open to interpretation is self-righteousness at it's extreme.
blackwidow wrote:Are you saying that because everyone has made mistakes in their past that we should be tolerant of this coaches lack of good judgement by putting his players in the position to even make this choice?
I'm saying what I said. Putting my two posts together, you should be able to figure out my position:
- It was not a good idea for the parents to ride the ump the way they did. If it didn't happen to occur in the context of this video, however, it's not particularly worthy of discussion.
- The ump showed up the pitcher on the call in question, IMO. Whether or not it actually was an intentional response to the heckling he was getting, or just a bad call, is anybody's guess, but it came across as intentional, and if I was the coach in this situation I probably would have interpreted it that way. Again, however, take away the context and it's not that interesting.
- I have no idea what was going through the coach's mind after that call (and is wasn't the first one), but I can tell you what would be going through mine if I was in that situation - You (the ump) are going to force her to throw a pitch that could get her hurt. If you (Blackwidow) want to argue this, I'm sure someone on this site who is associated with MG could arrange for you to come out and throw some meatballs to this MG team without a screen for protection to serve as proof of your convictions.
- While I have some understanding of the coach's mindset might have been, this was still poor judgement, and I would like to think that I would not do the same thing. That said, it wasn't the outright assault that it has been made out to be - the ump is well protected as getting hit like this is an understood hazard of the job.
How about this for a thumbnail synopsis? - there was a fair amount of tackiness displayed by a number of the parties involved. Not enough evidence for me to form an opinion about any of them, however, and why should I care? I do care that young women are getting called out by ill-informed shrews. That bothers me. It also bothers me that a coach and an org that presumably served many young women well is being called out in a way that could impair their ability to continue to serve in this capacity. If this is the only evidence against them, that seems worth defending. Other than that, it's not that big of a deal and not worth spouting my opinion on.