tbjd33 wrote:You truly have no clue... This has absolutely nothing to do with body type, body shape, work ethic or softball ability.
It's simply about a photo of a softball apparel company and a softball website choosing to place a photo for advertising purposes containing a young women (assuming she is under 18) in a non softball/suggestive pose with a suggestive caption.
Oh I don't know. I guess I have a standard foreign to you all. Maybe it's OK to exploit a young lady. Who cares about what on TV, who cares about what is on other forums of media.
So we stand here and say, well because they did it we can. Is that your level of expectation? Sure isn't mine!
TeaBag. You are extremely un-self aware. When you insinuate that you love your daughter more than another father loves his daughter, or that you raised your daughter with higher morals than another man's daughter, you lose any credibility that you so desperately want. Do you think any of the other guys posting on this thread love their kid less than you love yours, or want their kid to be disrespected by an ad? The answer is No.
Anyhoo, I personally believe that Gluv knew exactly what they were doing when they made that ad. Sex sells, and to a very large extent, the 'sexual connotation' contained in an ad is often in the mind of the beholder. That isn't Gluv's fault. Being a frantic dad doesn't alter that reality. Censoring ads that have body parts in them is moronic. IMO, if you have raised your kid successfully, then she is a confident, independent, strong person who isn't concerned with a Gluv-butt ad, and would find this thread amusing and lame.