Did I read that right? It was noted that some classifications already played at 70 feet this year.
"Bringing Defense Back."
EzOut.EzOut wrote:Did I read that right? It was noted that some classifications already played at 70 feet this year.
"Bringing Defense Back."
shagpal wrote:usssa had the right idea long ago
MTR wrote:shagpal wrote:usssa had the right idea long ago
ASA upper levels have been playing at 70-80 bases for more than a decade. It just finally matriculated down. The only thing that was holding it back at the lower levels the past 5 years was the P&R folks.
shagpal wrote:ASA is full of grey haired, over the hill types. everyone saw that weakness but them. it may be too little too late, who really knows, but then again, who really cares.
MTR wrote:shagpal wrote:ASA is full of grey haired, over the hill types. everyone saw that weakness but them. it may be too little too late, who really knows, but then again, who really cares.
No, it was the point that many of the council members are associated with their local Parks & Recs departments and they did not want to have to change their fields. Even with the change, many are still resisting the change.
shagpal wrote:in the last 3 years, 3 localities switched to utrip and 65ft bases. Ima not buying, but if yer convinced, then it must be so in your world. in the real world, usssa, nsa, premier, tcs and pony are making huge gains at the expense of asa stubborness, miscalculations and miscues. even the ncaa, frustrated with old skool asa geezers decided to go their own way a decade ago. but in your world, the asa is perfect, so it must be everyone else that is resisting.