College Softball
Pretty basic stuff with nothing new to say. Picking last years finalists in the WCWS as teams to watch is actually hilarious. Like duh, no kidding.
Same with players and pitchers. All proven studs. Duh.
Scratch Kentucky from "Other teams to watch." They finished strong last year but started really poorly this year, not nearly in the same league as UCLA (who isn't on the list at all!!)
Add UCLA to that list, and Michigan, with their two frosh pitchers looking sharp opening weekend.
It would be nice if when they put out this type of information is scratched a little below the surface.
Same with players and pitchers. All proven studs. Duh.
Scratch Kentucky from "Other teams to watch." They finished strong last year but started really poorly this year, not nearly in the same league as UCLA (who isn't on the list at all!!)
Add UCLA to that list, and Michigan, with their two frosh pitchers looking sharp opening weekend.
It would be nice if when they put out this type of information is scratched a little below the surface.
Ladies, if a man tells you he will fix it, he will fix it. There is no reason to remind him about it every six months.
-
Trophy Hunter - Posts: 889
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 4:50 pm
- Location: Where the big game is.
I agree- they seem to take the easy route. Pick last year's top teams and see what happens. Tough to really know the impact on new freshmen or even a 2 year benchwarmer finally getting their chance.
Their reporting on Div II and III is even worse with less info(and resources) available. I guess they view it as a "conversation starter"
Their reporting on Div II and III is even worse with less info(and resources) available. I guess they view it as a "conversation starter"
-
jonriv - Posts: 4875
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 6:01 am
- Location: Connecticut
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Main Menu
User Menu
Login
