LETHAL WEAPON 25 wrote:One thing that I would like to see ALL associations consider. There are 5 states who play HS Softball in the Fall. My State, Oklahoma, being one of those. Our HS season begins the first week of August and practice begins around the 3rd week of July. Most HS coaches can live with the players being gone for the first week of practice, but missing the first week of games is a little different story. Therefore it makes it extremely difficult on the players to have to miss HS Ball to play a national the first week of August with their travel team.
Who are the other 4 states that play HS softball in the fall? Have you considered there are far more states up north that would oppose moving Nats up because it would shorten their prime playing season?
LETHAL WEAPON 25 wrote:I think that is probably why here there is such a us vs them attitude between School Ball and Travel Ball.
[next post]... Another, HUGE factor is these girls WANT to represent their respective Schools, and here there is this huge Travel Ball vs. HS Ball conflict. There have been instances where really good players are sitting because the HS coach wants to "PUNISH" them for being gone the first week. Also, The HS coaches here want their players playing in their "Summer Programs" and that conflicts with the players travel team schedule so it causes this conflict. Ultimately, I believe its about the $$$ since most of the HS coaches are charging as much as $300 a kid for like a 20 game summer league. Simple math tells you that, at $300 a kid x's 20 or so kids for a league that is played on your own HS fields with local umpires where they charge a gate and offer concessions, someone is making some summer pocket change.
The conflict is all about $$$ and control. Moving Nats up isn't going to fix it.