texmex45 wrote: The top four teams were the 4 remaining teams in the WINNER'S bracket.
I don't think anyone who was watching the tournament objectively would agree. With all due respect to the Georgia Impact who came west and made a bigtime statement with their performance all weekend, Firecrackers Young was the 2nd-best team in the field. Many watching who commented on it out loud felt that their quarterfinal game vs Corona Angels Tyson should have been the tournament final.
I don't get into rankings, because I think it's silly to "rank" a bunch of 11-12yo girls playing a game, but I'd disagree with them if I did. Why not just call it the "Vegas 20" or something? lol I don't want to sound like a jerk or to tell anyone how to think, but I wouldn't give so much credit just for showing up. I know going to Vegas was a major commitment for the players and families who went, but if you're going to do a list, Freebilly, why mark teams down so much for choosing not to do this tournament? I enjoy talking about how teams are performing and progressing, however, and I do congratulate all those teams who went out and got the job done last weekend, regardless of what their goals were.
Because of the tournament setup, the results can be a little deceptive, in my opinion. Teams only got 2 seeding games out of the 3 in pool play and 1 loss meant going into the silver bracket. So, if you had a heavyweight in your pool, it was going to be especially difficult to get into the gold for Sunday. Then on Sunday, you could win your 1st game and be out after 2, whereas 1st-game losers could potentially get 3-4 more games. Looking at the list, if you know these teams, then you know that silver bracket was loaded with strong teams, too.