jonriv wrote:... I usually take the acela from Stamford to boston( hits 150 through Kingston, ri. ...
This is the only response that is relevant to my questions. That trip is about 175 miles, so 3 hours by car (without traffic). Acela Express is usually just under 3 hours and costs $105-159. Northeast Regional only takes 20-40 minutes longer and only costs $48-64. How do you justify the extra expense of taking Acela over the Regional?
California should have copied the European HSR model- expand conventuals rail and build high speed in segments. This keeps costs down, builds ridership and helps to build support. People respond better to things they can see and use. San Diego to la should have been upgrade a long time ago to at least semi high speed. California instead tried to copy the Chinese with giant and grand HSR plans that IMO overreach. I also think the San Fran San Jose line should have been electrified years ago.
LOL You criticize and lecture us on not building HSR in developed areas when you don't have a clue how much conventional rail is here and haven't really done HSR back there.
Trains have to compete with air and car travel based on cost, time and convenience. There are specific niches where train travel is competitive and it is ridiculous to push it outside them.