J_O_E wrote:jonriv wrote:J_O_E wrote:jonriv wrote: For those that don't know, Massachusetts makes California look conservative
Mmmmm....no, don't think so...
Can you say. "Kennedy"?
Yes I can. I can also say Pelosi and Gov. Moonbeam...
.
Pale Rider wrote:I'd love to see Biden reply to this...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=AkzNL69L_h0
jonriv wrote:
This woman(jihad Mom) is some piece of work. I hope she does come here so they can arrest her on the outstanding warrant for shoplifting from Lord & Taylor. She and her family are a disgrace to all of the hard harworking immigrants and asylum seekers that have come to this country. what an ungraetful b****.
Juxtapose the the other immigrants in this story- the chinise american(Danny) whose car was carjacked and who fled to freedom and called the police at a gas-station whose Arab-American worker assisted him-both of these guys helped in the capture of the bombers
Jeanine Pirro was once the kick-ass prosecuter for Westchester County in NY- if it were not for her low-lif, mob-connected husband she would have been the Governor or Senator for NY. She was a one woman anti-crime machine in her heyday
Pale Rider wrote:... Not against immigration, against illegal immigration and allowing terrorists in...paying for them, their lifestyles, their trips, their BMWs...Lets do this, an immigrant cannot get any welfare assistance beside food stamps for 10 yrs...none...Immediately put them on the tax roles though...any law infraction means plane ride home...end the anchor baby BS....bet the flood slows
PDad wrote:Pale Rider wrote:... Not against immigration, against illegal immigration and allowing terrorists in...paying for them, their lifestyles, their trips, their BMWs...Lets do this, an immigrant cannot get any welfare assistance beside food stamps for 10 yrs...none...Immediately put them on the tax roles though...any law infraction means plane ride home...end the anchor baby BS....bet the flood slows
It's yet another example of the Feds not enforcing the laws that are already on the books.
- A substantial portion of the illegal aliens are people that entered legally and stayed after their visa expired. Seems like nobody does anything about it unless they're arrested.
- It's against the law to employ people that are here legally, but the government allows companies to circumvent the law because they never provided a reliable means for employers to screen people and they don't follow up on the obvious cheaters. The latest immigration reform legislation under consideration is supposed to fix this - I'm not holding my breath.
I wholeheartedly agree with ending the anchor baby loophole. Unfortunately, I think it will take a constitutional ammendment to do it and there isn't nearly enough support to make that happen.
GIMNEPIWO wrote:PDad wrote:Pale Rider wrote:... Not against immigration, against illegal immigration and allowing terrorists in...paying for them, their lifestyles, their trips, their BMWs...Lets do this, an immigrant cannot get any welfare assistance beside food stamps for 10 yrs...none...Immediately put them on the tax roles though...any law infraction means plane ride home...end the anchor baby BS....bet the flood slows
It's yet another example of the Feds not enforcing the laws that are already on the books.
- A substantial portion of the illegal aliens are people that entered legally and stayed after their visa expired. Seems like nobody does anything about it unless they're arrested.
- It's against the law to employ people that are here legally, but the government allows companies to circumvent the law because they never provided a reliable means for employers to screen people and they don't follow up on the obvious cheaters. The latest immigration reform legislation under consideration is supposed to fix this - I'm not holding my breath.
I wholeheartedly agree with ending the anchor baby loophole. Unfortunately, I think it will take a constitutional ammendment to do it and there isn't nearly enough support to make that happen.
Employers, going back to the late 80's must fill out an I9 form which includes verification that prospective employees are entitled to be employed ... Of course, documents can be falsified or forged ...
Pale Rider wrote:GIMNEPIWO wrote:PDad wrote:Pale Rider wrote:... Not against immigration, against illegal immigration and allowing terrorists in...paying for them, their lifestyles, their trips, their BMWs...Lets do this, an immigrant cannot get any welfare assistance beside food stamps for 10 yrs...none...Immediately put them on the tax roles though...any law infraction means plane ride home...end the anchor baby BS....bet the flood slows
It's yet another example of the Feds not enforcing the laws that are already on the books.
- A substantial portion of the illegal aliens are people that entered legally and stayed after their visa expired. Seems like nobody does anything about it unless they're arrested.
- It's against the law to employ people that are here legally, but the government allows companies to circumvent the law because they never provided a reliable means for employers to screen people and they don't follow up on the obvious cheaters. The latest immigration reform legislation under consideration is supposed to fix this - I'm not holding my breath.
I wholeheartedly agree with ending the anchor baby loophole. Unfortunately, I think it will take a constitutional ammendment to do it and there isn't nearly enough support to make that happen.
Employers, going back to the late 80's must fill out an I9 form which includes verification that prospective employees are entitled to be employed ... Of course, documents can be falsified or forged ...
I can name 4, millionaires within a mile of me right now, who hire illegals everyday...and they couldnt tell you what an I-9 was....
