Schmick wrote:Out of state students are not subsidized, they pay a higher cost than instate students do. ...
Just because out-of-state fees are higher doesn't mean they aren't subsidized. In-state fees are generally subsidized at a very high level rather than granular per in-state student and out-of-state fees are rarely set based on an accurate cost per student. The result is some out-of-state fees are too low (i.e. subsidized) and some are excessive and subsidize in-state fees.
jonriv wrote:PDad wrote:jonriv wrote:The cost of instate or out of state is the same for scholarship students. The source(s) of payment are just different
C'mon JR, Schmick is clearly talking about tuition rather than the actual/marginal cost to the university for each student. ...
I know what he was saying, I was just pointing out his faulty logic and math! Your point that you make about being harmful to California players is right on
You failed miserably on both counts since you didn't clearly and directly address either one. It's strange you qualified "cost" is the same "for scholarship students." The "tuition cost" is only the same for full-ride schollies, which we know are the exception to the overwhelming rule in softball. The school's "cost" - ignoring the "source of payment" - is the same for ALL students.