by Battle » Thu Jun 04, 2015 5:22 pm
jonriv wrote:Why is the assumption that the ad is wrong? The investigation showed the trainer had perpetuated a "hostile workplace". If the coach was made aware and did nothing( which is what was accused) the university would be in their own interest to fire the coach to show they took action
Btw. This is not a trial, there is no presumption of innocence. A company/university will base its decision on the facts at hand and its own self interest
Really? Just fire him? After 18 years? Yeah, lets not give him the benefit of the doubt. Let's believe the "hey my kid is better than the starter". What was proven to be hostile?
It falls in with the stupidity of the public when it comes to arrests too. "Cop arrested him so he must have done it." "There must be something to it."
We herd sheep, we drive cattle, we lead people. Lead me, follow me, or get out of my way!