by Bretman » Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:49 am
I've seen the video several times. While entertaining, the "science" is sorely lacking.
My professional background is in engineering. I've had lots of experience in calculating how things break, bend and deform (failure analysis). Here's my take on the video and the shattering plexiglass.
Notice that all of the strikes by the baseball hit just about in the center of the plexiglass. It flexes and bends, but does not break. That is an expected result, as plexiglass can withstand a good deal of bending stress.
Now, watch the one where Jennie breaks the thing. The ball hits off-center, right along a metal bracket that the glass is mounted to. That the ball hit near a fixed point would result in more of a shear stress than a bending stress. Plexiglass cannot withstand nearly as much shear as bending.
If you've ever cut glass or plexiglass, the way you do it is to score the glass, then place something near the score and snap it off. That takes advantage of the natural properies of glass- it's inability to withstand shearing stress.
Now there's some real science for ya!
Instead, the experiment essentially failed, so instead of fixing the equipment and performing the test again, the program simply concluded that the softball had more force behind it. Bad science!
Besides all that, the formula for calculating kinetic energy would tell anyone that the faster moving baseball would have to generate more force, despite the slightly higher mass of the softball.
While the "science" was lacking, I will have to admit that anything with Jennie Finch does have a high entertainment factor!